shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Budibase?

Build AI agents, chat and automate internal workflows instantly. The fastest way to automate internal business processes. - budibase.com

Depends. Buy if you're a technical team building internal tools and comfortable self-hosting and patching. Skip if you need a stable free tier, predictable pricing, or a spotless security record.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~50 public sources: G2 and Reddit reviews, GitHub advisories (NVD, GHSA), Budibase's own pricing and security pages. Snippets truncated; exact G2 rating not retrievable.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Open Source (self-host)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierNo
Pro / Premiumfrom ~$50/creator/mo
EnterpriseCustom

Best for

  • Internal admin panels and CRUD apps
  • Ops teams automating workflows
  • Self-hosters on SQL databases

Not for

  • Security-sensitive apps exposed to untrusted traffic
  • Teams counting on the free Cloud tier
  • Non-technical teams with no database comfort
  • Buyers needing pricing stability long-term

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Cloud free tier is ending; budget for paid plans before you build

medium

OSS self-host user limits were announced; verify current caps before committing

medium

Per-creator pricing (~$50/mo) compounds quickly as more builders join

medium

Repeated licensing and pricing changes have burned early adopters; read self-host ToS first

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Open-source and self-hostable on your own infrastructure
  • Reviewer built a working app in about 10 minutes
  • Builds apps directly on top of your SQL databases
  • Users consistently praise ease of use on G2
  • ISO 27001 certified

Cons

  • Cloud free tier is being discontinued
  • Self-hosted open-source version will get user limits
  • Critical unauthenticated RCE vulnerability disclosed
  • Community accuses company of open-source bait and switch
  • Pricing tiers and limits keep changing

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/24/2026 - 12 sources - ISO 27001 certified, but 2026 brought a cluster of critical CVEs — unauthenticated RCE, auth bypass, SSRF. Patch fast if self-hosting.

official x3review x5security x1news x3
  • CVE-2026-35216: unauthenticated RCE, Unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Budibase.
  • CVE-2026-41428: authentication bypass, Critical auth bypass could expose app and user data.
  • CVE-2026-31818: SSRF by insecure default, Critical SSRF enabled by insecure default configuration.
  • CVE-2026-45061: SSRF, Server-side request forgery vulnerability in Budibase.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Free tier ending; per-creator pricing scales fast
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Reviewer built a working app in 10 minutes
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Apps, workflows, AI agents, SQL connectors
  • Support quality: 3/5. Open-source users get community-first support
  • Security posture: 2/5. Multiple critical CVEs despite ISO 27001
  • $50/creator/mo Starting price Paid plan, per third-party pricing guide
  • Ending Free Cloud tier Per Budibase team announcement
  • $7M seed Funding ~$9.9M total raised; Belfast startup
  • ISO 27001 Security cert Certified, but 2026 brought critical CVEs

Pricing

Open Source (self-host)

Free

  • Self-host on your own infra
  • User limits being introduced

Pro / Premium

from ~$50/creator/mo

  • Hosted cloud plans
  • 10K Budibase AI credits on Premium

Enterprise

Not disclosed

  • Advanced security and support
  • Contact sales

Security

ISO 27001 certified, but 2026 brought a cluster of critical CVEs — unauthenticated RCE, auth bypass, SSRF.

  • CVE-2026-35216: unauthenticated RCEUnauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Budibase.⁹
  • CVE-2026-41428: authentication bypassCritical auth bypass could expose app and user data.

Patch fast if self-hosting.

  • CVE-2026-31818: SSRF by insecure defaultCritical SSRF enabled by insecure default configuration.
  • CVE-2026-45061: SSRFServer-side request forgery vulnerability in Budibase.

What users say

Users like the ease of use and self-hosting on SQL, but community sentiment soured over user limits, the ending free tier, and shifting open-source terms.

“Budibase Will Soon Limit Users on OSS Self Hosted Version”
Reddit, r/selfhosted
“Opensource bait and switch?”
GitHub community discussion
“Budibase Cloud free tier is ending”
GitHub community discussion

Alternatives

Compare Budibase with each alternative.

  • Appsmith

    Developer-first open-source internal tool builder with free self-hosting.

  • Retool

    Commercial incumbent for internal tools; more polish, less open-source friction.

    Budibase vs Retool
  • ToolJet

    Open-source alternative with self-hosting and comparable app-building features.

    Budibase vs ToolJet
Full analysis

Based on ~50 public sources: G2 and Reddit reviews, GitHub advisories (NVD, GHSA), Budibase's own pricing and security pages. Snippets truncated; exact G2 rating not retrievable.

Solid open-source internal-tool builder, but free tier ending, self-host user limits, and a stack of critical CVEs. Test before you commit.

Methodology

Based on ~50 public sources: G2 and Reddit reviews, GitHub advisories (NVD, GHSA), Budibase's own pricing and security pages. Snippets truncated; exact G2 rating not retrievable.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. news
  5. news
  6. review
  7. review
  8. official
  9. security
  10. official
  11. news
  12. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.