shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use LockTrip?

Blockchain-based travel booking marketplace claiming below-market hotel prices - locktrip.com

Depends. Good fit for price-sensitive leisure travelers comfortable with a smaller OTA and optional crypto payments. Business travelers needing invoices, 24/7 support, and big-OTA buyer protections should book elsewhere.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~15 public sources; savings claims are mostly company marketing plus one user report. No independent audit found.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free to use; pay per booking

Traveler booking

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Budget leisure travelers
  • Crypto-friendly bookers
  • Deal hunters comparing OTA prices

Not for

  • Business travel needing invoices and duty-of-care support
  • Anyone prioritizing big-OTA buyer protections
  • Travelers avoiding crypto-tied platforms
  • Risk-averse bookers wanting a long, proven track record

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Savings claims unverified: ~20% company claim vs. 16% single user report.

medium

Support is email and AI chat only — no phone line.

medium

LOC token price volatility can affect crypto-denominated bookings.

medium

Terms disclaim broad liability; you carry most booking risk.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Users report 16% booking savings
  • Company claims ~20% below-market hotel prices
  • 2.1M+ hotels listed
  • Free to use; no subscription
  • $4.1M Webjet investment in 2021

Cons

  • Terms broadly disclaim company liability for bookings
  • Payment options center on crypto, adding friction
  • No dedicated security page found on site
  • Privacy policy dated March 2021; legal docs may be stale
  • Much smaller than and Airbnb incumbents

Sources & method

Analyzed 10/01/2026 - 12 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x4review x4security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • Free to use; pay per booking

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Users report 16% savings; claims up to 20%
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Familiar booking flow; crypto options add friction
  • Feature depth: 2/5. Booking marketplace plus crypto wallet basics only
  • Support quality: 2/5. Email and AI chat only; no SLA
  • Security posture: 3/5. Posts security updates; no public breaches found
  • 2.1M+ Hotels listed Per company homepage
  • ~20% Claimed avg. savings vs. market rates
  • 16% User-reported savings Single Trustpilot reviewer
  • $4.1M Funding Webjet investment, 2021

Pricing

Traveler booking

Free to use; pay per booking

  • 2.1M+ hotels
  • Claimed ~20% below market rates
  • 8+ crypto payment options

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Reviews mostly highlight real savings (one user reports 16%), while travel forum threads show cautious legitimacy questions.

“Locktrip saved me 16% co”
Trustpilot review
“Absolutely amazing! Lock”
Trustpilot review
Full analysis

Based on ~15 public sources; savings claims are mostly company marketing plus one user report. No independent audit found.

Budget OTA claiming ~20% hotel savings; users report 16%. Fine for leisure deals, weak for business travel support.

Methodology

Based on ~15 public sources; savings claims are mostly company marketing plus one user report. No independent audit found.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. Review | LockTrip (LOC)nederob.medium.com
    review
  4. official
  5. official
  6. LockTrip Supportlocktrip.com
    official
  7. news
  8. security
  9. official
  10. LockTrip price LOCcoinbase.com
    news
  11. review
  12. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.