Free
Price
Open source software
Report
Should I Use MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform?
MISP Threat Intelligence & Sharing
Depends
DependsAdopt it if you run a security team or CSIRT that collects and shares threat indicators and can self-host.
Free open-source threat intel sharing. Powerful for CSIRTs; overkill for small teams without security staff.
Confidence: Medium
Yes
Free tier
Fully open source
2.5.44
Latest release
Hotfix release, Jul 13
7+
Published CVEs
2015–2017 advisories, openly disclosed
Value for money
5
Free, open source, no license fees.
Ease of use
2
Needs correct setup and self-hosting.
Feature depth
5
Taxonomies, galaxies, objects, sync, sharing standards.
Support quality
3
Community default; commercial support sold separately.
Security posture
4
48-hour fixes, transparent CVEs, past XSS/auth bugs.
Pros
- Free and open source for collecting, storing, and sharing threat indicators.¹
- Ships with taxonomies, galaxies, objects, and MITRE ATT&CK cluster mappings.¹
- Confirmed security vulnerabilities usually fixed within 48 hours.²
- Transparent CVE publication, even for minor bugs.²
- Actively maintained: 2.5.44 hotfix shipped July 13.³
Cons
Gotchas
- mediumFree license, real cost is admin time: setup, tuning, syncs, patching.⁴
- mediumCommunity support by default; commercial support is a separate purchase.²
- mediumOpen standards ease exports, but building sharing communities takes sustained effort.¹
- lowFrequent hotfix releases mean regular patching of your instance.³
Best for
- CSIRTs and CERT teams
- Critical infrastructure security teams
- Threat intel sharing communities
- Malware analysts tracking IOCs
Not for
- Small teams without dedicated security staff
- Anyone wanting plug-and-play SaaS
- Organizations that can't self-host and patch
- Buyers needing vendor SLAs by default
Pricing
Open source
Free
- Collect, store, share indicators
- Taxonomies, galaxies, objects
- Sync and sharing communities
Security
Transparent disclosure culture; fixes within ~48 hours; several historical XSS/auth CVEs, all patched.
- CVE-2017-14337 — authentication bypassBefore 2.4.80, X.509 CertAuth with an external REST API returning an empty value granted unauthenticated access as an arbitrary user.²
- CVE-2017-13671 — persistent XSSPersistent XSS via comments in versions before 2.4.79; affected only users of the same instance.²
- CVE-2015-5721 — PHP object injectionVersions before 2.3.90 allowed PHP object injection via crafted serialized data in template flows.²
What users say
The one practitioner quote found calls it a favorite, flexible open source tool for intel feeds when set up correctly.
“is far my favorite tool for Intel feeds. Its open source, flexible, and if set up correctly can”
Alternatives
Compare MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform with each alternative.
OpenCTI
Open source threat intel platform with a more modern interface.
ThreatQ
Commercial threat intel platform with vendor support.
Anomali ThreatStream
Enterprise commercial TIP with managed onboarding.
MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform vs Anomali ThreatStreamRaw STIX/TAXII feeds
Just consuming feeds? Plain STIX/TAXII feeds may suffice.
Full analysis
Based on 9 public sources; independent user reviews scarce.
Sources
- MISP Project homepagemisp-project.orgofficial
- MISP Product security pagemisp-project.orgsecurity
- MISP community releasesmisp-community.orgofficial
- Cyspace Global Technology LinkedIn postlinkedin.comreview
- NTT Data: active cyber defense with MISPnttdata.comnews
- The Hive — threat modeling/hunting/intelligence resource7h3w4lk3r.gitbook.ioreview
Rate this review
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask a follow-up
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.