shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform Review

Depends

Should I use MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform?

MISP Threat Intelligence & Sharing - misp-project.org

· 1 month ago

Adopt it if you run a security team or CSIRT that collects and shares threat indicators and can self-host. Skip it if you have no dedicated security staff — free software still needs a full-time operator.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 9 public sources; independent user reviews scarce.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Open source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • CSIRTs and CERT teams
  • Critical infrastructure security teams
  • Threat intel sharing communities
  • Malware analysts tracking IOCs

Not for

  • Small teams without dedicated security staff
  • Anyone wanting plug-and-play SaaS
  • Organizations that can't self-host and patch
  • Buyers needing vendor SLAs by default

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Free license, real cost is admin time: setup, tuning, syncs, patching.

medium

Community support by default; commercial support is a separate purchase.

medium

Open standards ease exports, but building sharing communities takes sustained effort.

low

Frequent hotfix releases mean regular patching of your instance.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free and open source for collecting, storing, and sharing threat indicators.
  • Ships with taxonomies, galaxies, objects, and MITRE ATT&CK cluster mappings.
  • Confirmed security vulnerabilities usually fixed within 48 hours.
  • Transparent CVE publication, even for minor bugs.
  • Actively maintained: 2.5.44 hotfix shipped July 13.

Cons

  • Self-hosted; needs correct setup and ongoing maintenance.
  • History of XSS and authentication-bypass CVEs.
  • No turnkey SaaS; you run and patch the instance yourself.
  • Formal support requires separate commercial arrangements.

Sources & method

- 6 sources - Transparent disclosure culture; fixes within ~48 hours; several historical XSS/auth CVEs, all patched.

official x2review x2security x1news x1
  • CVE-2017-14337 — authentication bypass, Before 2.4.80, X.509 CertAuth with an external REST API returning an empty value granted unauthenticated access as an arbitrary user.
  • CVE-2017-13671 — persistent XSS, Persistent XSS via comments in versions before 2.4.79; affected only users of the same instance.
  • CVE-2015-5721 — PHP object injection, Versions before 2.3.90 allowed PHP object injection via crafted serialized data in template flows.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 6

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free, open source, no license fees.
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Needs correct setup and self-hosting.
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Taxonomies, galaxies, objects, sync, sharing standards.
  • Support quality: 3/5. Community default; commercial support sold separately.
  • Security posture: 4/5. 48-hour fixes, transparent CVEs, past XSS/auth bugs.
  • Free Price Open source software
  • Yes Free tier Fully open source
  • 2.5.44 Latest release Hotfix release, Jul 13
  • 7+ Published CVEs 2015–2017 advisories, openly disclosed

Pricing

Open source

Free

  • Collect, store, share indicators
  • Taxonomies, galaxies, objects
  • Sync and sharing communities

Security

Transparent disclosure culture; fixes within ~48 hours; several historical XSS/auth CVEs, all patched.

  • CVE-2017-14337 — authentication bypassBefore 2.4.80, X.509 CertAuth with an external REST API returning an empty value granted unauthenticated access as an arbitrary user.²
  • CVE-2017-13671 — persistent XSSPersistent XSS via comments in versions before 2.4.79; affected only users of the same instance.²
  • CVE-2015-5721 — PHP object injectionVersions before 2.3.90 allowed PHP object injection via crafted serialized data in template flows.²

What users say

The one practitioner quote found calls it a favorite, flexible open source tool for intel feeds when set up correctly.

“is far my favorite tool for Intel feeds. Its open source, flexible, and if set up correctly can”
LinkedIn — Cyspace Global Technology

Alternatives

Compare MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform with each alternative.

  • OpenCTI

    Open source threat intel platform with a more modern interface.

  • ThreatQ

    Commercial threat intel platform with vendor support.

  • Anomali ThreatStream

    Enterprise commercial TIP with managed onboarding.

  • Raw STIX/TAXII feeds

    Just consuming feeds? Plain STIX/TAXII feeds may suffice.

Companies that use it

  • NTT Data⁵
  • Cyspace Global Technology⁴
  • CIRCL (security contact and core team)²
Full analysis

Based on 9 public sources; independent user reviews scarce.

Free open-source threat intel sharing. Powerful for CSIRTs; overkill for small teams without security staff.

Methodology

Based on 9 public sources; independent user reviews scarce.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. MISP Project homepagemisp-project.org
    official
  2. security
  3. MISP community releasesmisp-community.org
    official
  4. review
  5. news
  6. review

Add this review to your site

This check for MISP Open Source Threat Intelligence Platform says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.