shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Npmjs Review

Worth it

Should I use Npmjs?

Not disclosed - npmjs.com

· 1 month ago

If you write JavaScript, npm is effectively mandatory — it's the default package registry and free for public packages. Security-sensitive teams should add lockfiles, allowlists, or a private proxy registry, and shouldn't expect polished support.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20+ public sources: npm docs and pricing pages, G2/Trustpilot reviews, Reddit threads, and 2025 security coverage. Review volume is very thin (4 Trustpilot reviews), so user sentiment leans on Reddit.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
ProPaid — price not shown in sources
TeamsPaid — price not shown in sources

Best for

  • JavaScript/Node.js developers
  • Open-source package publishers
  • Frontend and backend JS teams

Not for

  • Non-JavaScript stacks — use PyPI, NuGet, or Maven instead
  • Security-critical orgs without registry allowlists or scanning
  • Buyers who need polished UI and responsive vendor support
  • Anyone needing private packages on a $0 budget

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

One compromised maintainer account can push malicious updates to hundreds of millions of weekly installs.

medium

Private packages require paid Pro/Teams plans; the free tier is public-only.

medium

Your email becomes publicly visible when you publish a package.

medium

Support runs through @npm_support and @npmstatus; reviewers report slow, thin service.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • De facto registry for JavaScript packages, frontend and backend
  • Free tier for public package authors
  • Built-in dependency vulnerability auditing (npm audit)
  • Trusted publishing cuts reliance on long-lived tokens

Cons

  • Sept 2025 attack compromised 19 packages; one had ~371M weekly downloads
  • Users call 'abandoned'; support feels neglected
  • Publishing a package exposes your email publicly
  • New publishing friction reported after policy changes
  • Package quality varies; many trivial packages

Sources & method

- 11 sources - High-risk: repeated supply-chain compromises, including a Sept 2025 worm affecting 19 popular packages; 19 CVEs tracked.

official x2review x4security x4news x1
  • September 2025 npm supply-chain attack, Phishing-led account takeover published a self-replicating worm; 19 packages compromised; CISA advisory issued Sept 23, 2025.
  • CVE-2021-37701 — npm tar RCE, Remote code execution vulnerability in npm's tar dependency, per SentinelOne.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Core registry free; paid only for private packages
  • Ease of use: 4/5. G2 calls it easy; Reddit cites publishing friction
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Orgs, staged publishing, trusted publishing, audit
  • Support quality: 2/5. Reddit users call the site abandoned
  • Security posture: 2/5. Repeated supply-chain attacks; 19 CVEs tracked
  • 4.0/5 Trustpilot rating Only 4 reviews — very thin sample
  • $0 Starting price Free for public package authors
  • 19 Public CVEs tracked Per OpenCVE listing
  • 2014 VC-backed since Per Scripting News coverage

Pricing

Free

$0

  • For public package authors

Pro

Paid — price not shown in sources

  • Individual paid user plan
  • Private packages per upgrade docs

Teams

Paid — price not shown in sources

  • Paid organization plan
  • Team features per comparison page

Security

High-risk: repeated supply-chain compromises, including a Sept 2025 worm affecting 19 popular packages; 19 CVEs tracked.

  • September 2025 npm supply-chain attackPhishing-led account takeover published a self-replicating worm; 19 packages compromised; CISA advisory issued Sept 23, 2025.⁷
  • CVE-2021-37701 — npm tar RCERemote code execution vulnerability in npm's tar dependency, per SentinelOne.⁹

What users say

Review volume is tiny; G2 users find package management easy, while Reddit threads criticize site neglect, publishing friction, package quality, and security.

“Why is npmjs.com so abandoned?”
Reddit, r/npm
“I am concerned about the low quality of NPM packages.”
Reddit, r/typescript
“New friction with npmjs and publishing”
Reddit, r/npm

Companies that use it

  • Red Hat
Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources: npm docs and pricing pages, G2/Trustpilot reviews, Reddit threads, and 2025 security coverage. Review volume is very thin (4 Trustpilot reviews), so user sentiment leans on Reddit.

The default JavaScript package registry: essential and free for JS work, but supply-chain attacks and thin support demand extra guardrails.

Methodology

Based on 20+ public sources: npm docs and pricing pages, G2/Trustpilot reviews, Reddit threads, and 2025 security coverage. Review volume is very thin (4 Trustpilot reviews), so user sentiment leans on Reddit.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. official
  7. security
  8. security
  9. security
  10. security
  11. news

Add this review to your site

Npmjs earned a Worth it check.

Put the badge on your site, pricing page, or docs.

Visitors see an independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.