shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use Npmjs?

npmjs.com·Analyzed 1 day ago··Based on 11 sources

Worth it

Worth it

If you write JavaScript, npm is effectively mandatory — it's the default package registry and free for public packages.

The default JavaScript package registry: essential and free for JS work, but supply-chain attacks and thin support demand extra guardrails.

Confidence: Medium

4.0/5

Trustpilot rating

Only 4 reviews — very thin sample

$0

Starting price

Free for public package authors

19

Public CVEs tracked

Per OpenCVE listing

2014

VC-backed since

Per Scripting News coverage

Value for money5

Core registry free; paid only for private packages

Ease of use4

G2 calls it easy; Reddit cites publishing friction

Feature depth4

Orgs, staged publishing, trusted publishing, audit

Support quality2

Reddit users call the site abandoned

Security posture2

Repeated supply-chain attacks; 19 CVEs tracked

Pros

  • De facto registry for JavaScript packages, frontend and backend¹
  • Free tier for public package authors
  • Built-in dependency vulnerability auditing (npm audit)
  • Trusted publishing cuts reliance on long-lived tokens

Cons

  • Sept 2025 attack compromised 19 packages; one had ~371M weekly downloads
  • Users call 'abandoned'; support feels neglected³
  • Publishing a package exposes your email publicly
  • New publishing friction reported after policy changes
  • Package quality varies; many trivial packages

Gotchas

  • highOne compromised maintainer account can push malicious updates to hundreds of millions of weekly installs.
  • mediumPrivate packages require paid Pro/Teams plans; the free tier is public-only.
  • mediumYour email becomes publicly visible when you publish a package.
  • mediumSupport runs through @npm_support and @npmstatus; reviewers report slow, thin service.²

Best for

  • JavaScript/Node.js developers
  • Open-source package publishers
  • Frontend and backend JS teams

Not for

  • Non-JavaScript stacks — use PyPI, NuGet, or Maven instead
  • Security-critical orgs without registry allowlists or scanning
  • Buyers who need polished UI and responsive vendor support
  • Anyone needing private packages on a $0 budget

Companies that use it

  • Red Hat

Pricing

Free

$0

  • For public package authors

Pro

Paid — price not shown in sources

  • Individual paid user plan
  • Private packages per upgrade docs

Teams

Paid — price not shown in sources

  • Paid organization plan
  • Team features per comparison page

Security

High-risk: repeated supply-chain compromises, including a Sept 2025 worm affecting 19 popular packages; 19 CVEs tracked.

  • September 2025 npm supply-chain attackPhishing-led account takeover published a self-replicating worm; 19 packages compromised; CISA advisory issued Sept 23, 2025.
  • CVE-2021-37701 — npm tar RCERemote code execution vulnerability in npm's tar dependency, per SentinelOne.

What users say

Review volume is tiny; G2 users find package management easy, while Reddit threads criticize site neglect, publishing friction, package quality, and security.

Why is npmjs.com so abandoned?
Reddit, r/npm
I am concerned about the low quality of NPM packages.
Reddit, r/typescript
New friction with npmjs and publishing
Reddit, r/npm

Alternatives

Compare Npmjs with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources: npm docs and pricing pages, G2/Trustpilot reviews, Reddit threads, and 2025 security coverage. Review volume is very thin (4 Trustpilot reviews), so user sentiment leans on Reddit.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. official
  7. security
  8. security
  9. security
  10. security
  11. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.

    Comments

    One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.

    Save a name to write a comment.

    No comments yet.