shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Outlook?

Not disclosed - outlook.com

Depends. Buy it if your organization already runs Microsoft 365 — Outlook is the default, deeply integrated client there. Skip it for personal or privacy-sensitive use; free clients like Thunderbird cover the basics without the CVE churn or forced New Outlook migration.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 40+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated, and no exact dollar prices appeared in the evidence.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Outlook.com Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Microsoft 365 Personal/FamilySubscription (price not shown in sources)
Microsoft 365 BusinessPer-user subscription

Best for

  • Microsoft 365 organizations
  • Exchange-server email shops
  • Teams that need mail+calendar+contacts unified
  • Add-in and signature ecosystems

Not for

  • Privacy-sensitive users wanting minimal attack surface
  • Non-Microsoft shops facing forced New Outlook migration
  • Buyers wanting one simple standalone email price
  • Anyone unwilling to patch within days of CVEs

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Classic Outlook is being retired; New Outlook drops features some workflows rely on.

high

Personal accounts are frequent phishing and hijack targets; enable 2FA immediately.

medium

Advanced security features are gated behind a Microsoft 365 subscription.

medium

Business email requires a Microsoft 365 per-user subscription; no standalone listed price in sources.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free email and calendar without a subscription
  • Called the most capable email client in expert reviews
  • Copilot AI support documented in real deployments
  • Large add-in ecosystem: signatures, security, integrations
  • Bundled across Microsoft 365 business and enterprise plans

Cons

  • New Outlook migration stripped features; strong user backlash
  • Repeated critical vulnerabilities, including zero-click RCE
  • Users report account compromises after data breaches
  • FBI warns attackers hijack Microsoft 365 logins at scale

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/24/2026 - 13 sources - Actively targeted: multiple critical RCE CVEs patched 2024–2026; fast patching and 2FA are mandatory.

official x4review x5security x3news x1
  • CVE-2024-21413 — Remote Code Execution, Critical RCE (MonikerLink) in Outlook; public proof-of-concept exists.
  • Zero-click vulnerability, May 2026 patch, Microsoft patched a critical zero-click Outlook vulnerability.
  • CVE-2026-42893 — RCE, Remote code execution vulnerability tracked in SentinelOne's database.
  • CVE-2025-32705, Outlook vulnerability detailed in NIST's National Vulnerability Database.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free tier; included in Microsoft 365 plans
  • Ease of use: 2/5. New Outlook migration drew heavy user backlash
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Reviewers call it the most capable client
  • Support quality: 2/5. Microsoft Q&A threads show unresolved complaints
  • Security posture: 2/5. Stream of critical RCE CVEs; FBI hijack warnings
  • 3,536 G2 reviews filterable on G2
  • 2,687 Trustpilot reviewers outlook.live.com
  • Yes Free tier free email and calendar
  • 4+ Recent CVEs 2024–2026, incl. RCE and zero-click

Pricing

Outlook.com Free

Free

  • Free email and calendar
  • Advanced security requires paid 365

Microsoft 365 Personal/Family

Subscription (price not shown in sources)

  • Ad-free premium Outlook
  • Advanced security features

Microsoft 365 Business

Per-user subscription

  • Custom-domain business email
  • Full Outlook desktop and mobile

Security

Actively targeted: multiple critical RCE CVEs patched 2024–2026; fast patching and 2FA are mandatory.

  • CVE-2024-21413 — Remote Code ExecutionCritical RCE (MonikerLink) in Outlook; public proof-of-concept exists.⁹
  • Zero-click vulnerability, May 2026 patchMicrosoft patched a critical zero-click Outlook vulnerability.10
  • CVE-2026-42893 — RCERemote code execution vulnerability tracked in SentinelOne's database.11
  • CVE-2025-32705Outlook vulnerability detailed in NIST's National Vulnerability Database.

What users say

Long-time users praise its depth but many are furious about the forced New Outlook migration and recurring security incidents.

“the new Microsoft Outlook is pure garbage”
Reddit, r/Outlook
“Outlook continues to be an absolute disgrace.”
Reddit, r/Outlook
“Alternatives to the inferior "New Outlook"”
Microsoft Learn Q&A

Alternatives

Compare Outlook with each alternative.

  • Thunderbird

    Free, open-source, no Microsoft lock-in

  • Mailbird

    Lighter Windows client, simpler to run

    Outlook vs Mailbird
  • MDaemon Email Server

    Private on-prem email server, G2-recognized

Companies that use it

  • Johns Hopkins University13
Full analysis

Based on 40+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated, and no exact dollar prices appeared in the evidence.

Great inside Microsoft 365; painful outside it. Free tier exists, but critical CVEs land often — patch fast, use 2FA.

Methodology

Based on 40+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated, and no exact dollar prices appeared in the evidence.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. official
  7. official
  8. official
  9. security
  10. security
  11. security
  12. news
  13. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.