shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Apache PDFBox | A Java PDF Library?

Open source Java tool for creating, manipulating, and extracting content from PDF documents, with command-line utilities. Apache License v2.0. - pdfbox.apache.org

Depends. Buy it if your team writes Java and needs to create, edit, or extract PDFs programmatically — it's free and battle-tested. Skip it if you're not a developer or not on the JVM; a converter tool or a Python/Node library fits better.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; mostly official docs and academic citations, few in-depth user reviews.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityMailing lists documented; no quality data
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Open source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Java developers building PDF features
  • Bulk PDF text extraction pipelines
  • Archival and document-management systems
  • Teams avoiding iText licensing costs

Not for

  • Non-developers who just want to edit a PDF
  • One-off PDF tasks — use free online tools
  • Python, Node, or .NET shops — wrong ecosystem
  • Anyone expecting automatic signature or PDF/A validation

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

DoS from hostile PDFs (CPU, memory, recursion) is explicitly out of security scope — add your own limits.

medium

Encryption and signatures rely on Bouncy Castle/JCA; crypto vulnerabilities get reported upstream, not here.

medium

Free means community mailing-list support only — no vendor, no SLA.

low

Multiple major versions mean migration guides and upgrade churn.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free, open source under Apache License v2.0 — no vendor or licensing costs.
  • Handles PDF creation, manipulation, content extraction, plus command-line utilities.
  • Permissive license wins over iText for many Java developers.
  • Long track record in academic, archival, and search-engine projects.
  • Publishes an explicit security threat model for processing untrusted PDFs.

Cons

  • Low-level library — no automatic signature, PDF/A, or permissions validation.
  • Malformed PDFs causing hangs or exceptions are not treated as security bugs.
  • Resource limits, timeouts, and sandboxing for untrusted PDFs are your job.
  • Java-only — irrelevant if you build in Python, Node, or .NET.

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 8 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1review x3security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 8

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free, Apache-licensed, no paid tiers
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Low-level library; needs Java coding skill
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Create, edit, extract, encrypt, sign; CLI included
  • Support quality. Mailing lists documented; no quality data
  • Security posture: 3/5. Public threat model; DoS risks fall on you
  • Free Price Apache License v2.0
  • Apr 2024 Latest release Maven Central, 2.0.x line
  • Java Ecosystem Library plus command-line tools

Pricing

Open source

$0

  • Full Java PDF library
  • Command-line utilities
  • Apache License v2.0

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Companies that use it

  • Linagora (LinShare thumbnail engine)
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources; mostly official docs and academic citations, few in-depth user reviews.

Free, solid Java PDF library for developers. Skip it if you're not coding — use a converter instead.

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources; mostly official docs and academic citations, few in-depth user reviews.

Sources

  1. official
  2. security
  3. review
  4. review
  5. news
  6. news
  7. news
  8. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.