shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use pnpm?

pnpm.io·Analyzed 3 hours ago··Based on 9 sources

Fast, disk space efficient package manager

Worth it

Worth it

Adopt it if you write JavaScript — it is free, installs 2–3× faster than npm, and cuts disk use 50–70%.

Free, 2–3× faster installs than npm with 50–70% less disk. Best upgrade for JS and monorepo teams.

Confidence: High

$0

Starting price

Open source, MIT license

Yes

Free tier

Entirely free, no paid tiers

36k

GitHub stars

2k forks

2–3× faster than npm

Install speed

50–70% disk savings

Value for money5

Free, faster, and saves disk

Feature depth4

Monorepo support, strict node_modules layout

Security posture3

Multiple 2026 CVEs, actively patched

Pros

  • Up to 2x faster than npm and Yarn¹
  • Installs 2–3× faster than npm, saves 50–70% disk³
  • Content-addressable store dedupes packages across projects
  • Non-flat node_modules and monorepo support by default
  • Free and MIT-licensed

Cons

  • Not the fastest — Bun is 18× faster³
  • Yarn 4 called 'the safest default' in comparisons³
  • Multiple 2026 CVEs, including a critical path traversal

Gotchas

  • highCritical path-traversal CVE disclosed; run latest version and pin upgrades
  • mediumSpeed advantage shrinks vs Bun; benchmark against your own CI first³
  • mediumGuess: migrating npm/Yarn projects means lockfile conversion and CI rewiring³

Best for

  • JavaScript/Node teams with heavy dependency trees
  • Monorepo workspaces
  • CI pipelines where install speed matters
  • Disk-constrained developer machines

Not for

  • Non-JavaScript projects — it only manages Node packages
  • Teams all-in on Bun, which is 18× faster
  • Anyone expecting vendor support or SLAs — it is community OSS
  • Teams that cannot change lockfiles and CI config

Pricing

pnpm

$0

  • Full CLI, workspaces and monorepo support
  • Community support via GitHub

Security

Actively maintained with a published security policy, but multiple 2026 CVEs (path traversal, one critical) — keep it updated.

  • CVE-2026-55699 — External Control of File Name or PathAffected versions vulnerable to external control of file name or path.
  • CVE-2026-24131 — Path TraversalPath traversal vulnerability in dependency handling.
  • CVE-2026-50015 — Critical path traversalFlagged as critical for versions prior to the fix.

What users say

Third-party benchmarks and developer write-ups consistently confirm the speed and disk claims, with Bun as the main speed rival.

On its docs page you can read that pnpm is a 'fast, disk space efficient package manager.' It really is fast - locally, up to three times
dev.to review
pnpm installs 2-3× faster than npm and saves 50-70% disk. Bun is 18× faster but swaps your runtime. Yarn 4 is the safest default.
DeployHQ benchmark comparison
pnpm is a fast, disk-efficient package manager for Node.js. It installs dependencies up to 3× faster than npm, uses up to 80% less disk space
fireup.pro comparison

Alternatives

Compare pnpm with each alternative.

npm

Default choice; slower but zero migration effort

Yarn

Called the safest default in recent comparisons

Full analysis

Based on 15+ public sources. No named corporate users found in evidence; security findings are publicly disclosed CVEs.

Sources

  1. official
  2. pnpm on GitHubgithub.com
    official
  3. review
  4. review
  5. official
  6. security
  7. Snyk — CVE-2026-55699security.snyk.io
    security
  8. security
  9. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.

    Comments

    One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.

    Save a name to write a comment.

    No comments yet.