$0
Starting price
Open source, MIT license
Report
Fast, disk space efficient package manager
Worth it
Worth itAdopt it if you write JavaScript — it is free, installs 2–3× faster than npm, and cuts disk use 50–70%.
Free, 2–3× faster installs than npm with 50–70% less disk. Best upgrade for JS and monorepo teams.
$0
Starting price
Open source, MIT license
Yes
Free tier
Entirely free, no paid tiers
36k
GitHub stars
2k forks
2–3× faster than npm
Install speed
50–70% disk savings
Free, faster, and saves disk
Monorepo support, strict node_modules layout
Multiple 2026 CVEs, actively patched
$0
Actively maintained with a published security policy, but multiple 2026 CVEs (path traversal, one critical) — keep it updated.
Third-party benchmarks and developer write-ups consistently confirm the speed and disk claims, with Bun as the main speed rival.
“On its docs page you can read that pnpm is a 'fast, disk space efficient package manager.' It really is fast - locally, up to three times”
“pnpm installs 2-3× faster than npm and saves 50-70% disk. Bun is 18× faster but swaps your runtime. Yarn 4 is the safest default.”
“pnpm is a fast, disk-efficient package manager for Node.js. It installs dependencies up to 3× faster than npm, uses up to 80% less disk space”
Compare pnpm with each alternative.
Default choice; slower but zero migration effort
Called the safest default in recent comparisons
All-in-one toolkit, 18× faster, but swaps your runtime
pnpm vs BunBased on 15+ public sources. No named corporate users found in evidence; security findings are publicly disclosed CVEs.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.