shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use python-docx?

Python library for reading, creating, and updating Microsoft Word (.docx) files - python-docx.readthedocs.io

Depends. Buy if you're a Python developer automating Word documents — it's free, mature, and does the job. Skip it entirely if you can't code; use Word, a template service, or a no-code document tool instead.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 14 public sources

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Open source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Python developers generating reports or invoices
  • Apps needing programmatic .docx editing
  • Bulk document generation from templates
  • CI pipelines producing Word files

Not for

  • Non-technical users editing Word docs — just use Word
  • No-code/low-code teams wanting a GUI
  • Anyone needing vendor support or an SLA
  • Legacy .doc files — it only handles Word 2007+ .docx

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

CVE-2016-5851 XXE vulnerability in versions before 0.8.6 — pin a recent release

medium

Last updated about a year ago; expect slow fixes for edge cases

medium

No vendor support — you debug issues yourself or rely on community

low

No lock-in (MIT), but switching document libraries later costs rewrite time

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free and open source under MIT license
  • Reads, creates, and updates Word 2007+ .docx files
  • Simple pip install
  • Mature: 12 years old, 5,685 GitHub stars
  • Fine-grained access to Word document structures

Cons

  • No GUI — requires Python coding skills
  • Only Word 2007+ .docx; no legacy .doc support
  • No commercial support; slow maintenance cadence
  • Tiny review base: only 12 G2 reviews

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/21/2026 - 8 sources - One old, fixed CVE (XXE, pre-0.8.6); current 1.2.0 scanned clean.

official x3review x2security x3
  • CVE-2016-5851: XML External Entity (XXE) attack, Versions before 0.8.6 allowed XXE attacks via crafted documents through XML parsers resolving external entities. Fixed in 0.8.6.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 8

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free and MIT licensed
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Solid docs, but requires Python coding
  • Feature depth: 3/5. Handles .docx create/read/update, not full Office
  • Support quality: 2/5. Community project, no vendor support
  • Security posture: 4/5. One old fixed CVE; recent scan clean
  • 4.0/5 G2 rating 12 reviews
  • Free Price MIT license, open source
  • 5,685 GitHub stars per Snyk project stats
  • 12 years Age last updated ~1 year ago

Pricing

Open source

Free

  • Full library
  • MIT license
  • pip install

Security

One old, fixed CVE (XXE, pre-0.8.6); current 1.2.0 scanned clean.

  • CVE-2016-5851: XML External Entity (XXE) attackVersions before 0.8.6 allowed XXE attacks via crafted documents through XML parsers resolving external entities. Fixed in 0.8.6.⁵

What users say

A small but positive review base: 4.0/5 across 12 G2 reviews, with developers valuing direct, code-level control of Word documents.

“python-docx is excellent when you are building a Python application and want direct library access to Word document structures.”
safe-docx comparison article
Full analysis

Based on 14 public sources

Free, mature Python library for automating Word .docx files. Great for developers; useless if you can't code.

Methodology

Based on 14 public sources

Sources

  1. python-docx 1.2.0 documentationpython-docx.readthedocs.io
    official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. security
  5. security
  6. security
  7. review
  8. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.