shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Theathletic?

Not disclosed - theathletic.com

Depends. Buy if you're a die-hard fan of specific teams and can grab an intro rate; the beat-reporting depth is real. Skip if you're a casual score-checker, privacy-wary, or evaluating it as business software — it's a consumer news subscription.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 40+ public sources; many snippets truncated, so quotes and figures are partial.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Intro promo

£1.50/mo for 12 months (user-reported)

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Intro annual~33% off annual via checkout

Best for

  • Die-hard fans of specific teams
  • Fantasy players needing deep beats
  • Multi-league followers
  • Podcast-heavy sports listeners

Not for

  • Casual score-checkers — free apps cover that
  • Buyers evaluating business software — it's consumer news
  • Anyone unwilling to track intro-rate renewals
  • Privacy-cautious users given the data-sharing lawsuit

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Intro rates auto-renew at full price; retention discounts exist but only if you push

medium

No phone support for cancellation per user reports — plan around the web flow

medium

Class action alleges viewing history shared without consent — review privacy settings

low

Coupon sites advertise '80% off' — verify real pricing at checkout

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Deep beat reporting; 70+ soccer experts alone
  • Steep intro deals reported — £1.50/mo for 12 months
  • Now inside The New York Times ecosystem
  • Broad coverage: NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, college football

Cons

  • 1.1/5 ('Bad') on Trustpilot
  • Cancellation reportedly frustrating; users can't find a phone number
  • Faces data-sharing lawsuit over viewing history without consent

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/25/2026 - 12 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x6security x2news x1
  • The Athletic Data Sharing Lawsuit, Class action alleges The Athletic shared users' viewing history without proper consent.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • £1.50/mo for 12 months (user-reported)

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Deep intro promos, but full-price worth is questioned
  • Ease of use: 3/5. App Store reviews flag update and bug complaints
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Deep beats across NFL, NBA, MLB, NHL, soccer; 70+ soccer writers
  • Support quality: 2/5. Users can't find cancellation phone support
  • Security posture: 2/5. Data-sharing privacy lawsuit; no known breaches reported
  • 1.1/5 Trustpilot rating theathletic.com, rated 'Bad'
  • 4.6/5 WorthEpenny rating user reviews on worthepenny
  • £1.50/mo Intro price 12-month promo reported by users
  • New York Times Owner served at nytimes.com/athletic

Pricing

Intro promo

£1.50/mo for 12 months (user-reported)

  • Full access during intro
  • Auto-renews at higher rate

Intro annual

~33% off annual via checkout

  • Standard annual intro discount
  • Auto-renews at full price

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

  • The Athletic Data Sharing LawsuitClass action alleges The Athletic shared users' viewing history without proper consent.⁵

What users say

Sentiment is polarized: recurring 'is it worth it?' threads on team subreddits, a 4.6/5 on WorthEpenny, but a 1.1/5 on Trustpilot.

“Is a subscription worth it?”
Reddit, r/theAthletic
“The Athletic - worth paying for?”
Reddit, r/football
“Is The Athletic worth it?”
Reddit, r/CHIBears

Alternatives

Compare Theathletic with each alternative.

  • ESPN (free)

    Guess: free scores, news, and highlights for casual fans

  • Team subreddits

    Free per-team news aggregation and fan discussion

  • NYT bundle

    Guess: often cheaper bundled with NYT news and Games

  • Beat-writer newsletters

    Guess: cheap single-team depth without bundle lock-in

Full analysis

Based on 40+ public sources; many snippets truncated, so quotes and figures are partial.

Deep team-by-team sports reporting; 1.1/5 Trustpilot, hard cancellation, privacy lawsuit. Only worth it at intro pricing.

Methodology

Based on 40+ public sources; many snippets truncated, so quotes and figures are partial.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. security
  6. security
  7. official
  8. official
  9. official
  10. review
  11. review
  12. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.