shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use shadcn/ui?

ui.shadcn.com·Analyzed 18 hours ago··Based on 10 sources

Composable, accessible components with thoughtful defaults. Build your own component library with code you can customize, extend, and make your own.

Worth it

Worth it

Free and excellent if your team writes React and Tailwind and wants to own its UI code outright.

Free, own-your-code React components — brilliant for React/Tailwind devs, useless without developers.

Confidence: Medium

$0

Price

Free and open source

Copy-paste

Distribution model

Code lives in your repo, not npm

60 companies

Tracked users

Per TheirStack tech directory

Value for money5

Completely free, open source, no fees

Ease of use3

Fast for React devs; steep for beginners

Feature depth4

Broad accessible components plus blocks ecosystem

Support quality2

Community-only support via GitHub discussions

Security posture2

No security page; registry CVEs documented

Pros

  • Completely free and open source³
  • You copy the code, so you own and customize everything²
  • Accessible components with thoughtful defaults¹
  • Built on Radix primitives, a battle-tested behavior layer
  • Large ecosystem of blocks, templates, and Figma kits

Cons

  • Code is copied in, so upstream fixes and updates aren't automatic
  • Requires React and Tailwind skills; beginners told to learn those first
  • Maintenance and customization overhead divides user opinion
  • No official security page found on the docs site

Gotchas

  • highThird-party registry components are a real attack surface: Plate editor shipped XSS CVEs apps inherited.
  • highResearchers showed registry injection could run arbitrary shell commands during component install; vet registries.
  • mediumYou maintain copied code forever; switching libraries later means rewrites across your app.
  • lowPaid ecosystem: Figma kits, pro blocks, and templates cost extra from third-party sellers.

Best for

  • React + Tailwind product teams
  • Startups building their own design system
  • Devs who want to own component code
  • AI-assisted workflows (v0, Cursor)

Not for

  • Non-React stacks (Vue, Svelte, plain HTML)
  • Beginners who haven't learned React and Tailwind
  • Teams wanting automatic npm updates and vendor support
  • No-code founders building without developers

Pricing

shadcn/ui (core)

Free

  • All core components and blocks
  • Copy-paste into your repo
  • CLI and registry access

Security

Open source with no vendor security page found; real CVEs exist in ecosystem registry components plus documented registry-injection risk.

  • Plate rich-text editor XSS (CVE-2026-88976, CVE-2026-55596)High-severity cross-site scripting flaws in Plate, a shadcn/ui-based editor that apps copy in.
  • Registry injection riskResearchers demonstrated malicious registry entries could execute arbitrary shell commands during install.
  • Vulnerable lodash dependency (shadcn-ui@0.8.0)pnpm audit flagged a lodash vulnerability in the CLI package, per a GitHub issue.

What users say

Sentiment is strongly positive on speed and design quality, with recurring complaints about maintenance overhead and beginner-unfriendliness.

I'm a big fan of Shadcn UI, it's helped me ship projects 10x fast
YouTube review, The BIG Problem With Shadcn UI
Customization is the main selling point of shadcn
Reddit, r/nextjs (I tried shadcn/ui and I did not lik it)
Not trying to derogate any library, just confused
Reddit, r/reactjs

Alternatives

Compare shadcn/ui with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on ~50 public sources; mostly developer-community discussion since the product is free open source rather than a paid purchase.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. news
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. security
  9. security
  10. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.