Should I use Wazuh?
Wazuh is a free and open source security platform that unifies XDR and SIEM protection for endpoints and cloud workloads. - wazuh.com
Depends. Buy it if you have security engineers to deploy, tune, and patch an open-source SIEM — nothing matches the $0 price. Avoid it if you need turnkey detection or lack dedicated security staff; it will sit misconfigured.
Confidence
Medium. Based on 25+ public sources: Reddit threads, G2, case studies, CVE databases, and pricing trackers.
Ratings
- Value for money
- Ease of use
- Feature depth
- Support qualityNo support quality evidence in sources
- Security posture
Pricing
$0
Open Source (self-hosted)
ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Wazuh CloudNot published
Professional SupportCustom
Best for
- →Teams with in-house security engineers
- →Cost-sensitive orgs avoiding $300K/yr SIEMs
- →MSPs building SOC offerings
- →AWS and cloud-heavy estates
Not for
- ×Small teams with no dedicated security staff
- ×Anyone wanting turnkey, out-of-the-box detection
- ×Buyers needing vendor SLAs on the free tier
- ×Orgs that cannot patch infrastructure quickly after CVEs
Gotchas - check before you buy
high
Little works out of the box; expect significant setup before useful detections appear
high
Critical RCEs in 2025-2026 mean slow patching of your manager is dangerous
medium
Free license, not free labor: infra, staffing, and tuning are the real total cost
medium
False alerts are a documented pain point; plan continuous rule tuning
Pros and cons
Pros
- +Free and open source: full SIEM/XDR platform at zero license cost
- +Unifies XDR and SIEM across endpoints and cloud workloads
- +Includes vulnerability detection and compliance reporting for GDPR and PCI DSS
- +Real production case studies, including Groupon monitoring AWS workloads
- +Large community plus managed deployment options on AWS Marketplace
Cons
- −Won't do much out of the box; heavy tuning required
- −Self-hosting means you own scaling, upgrades, and reliability
- −Multiple critical RCE vulnerabilities found in the product itself
- −Documented false-alert problem demands ongoing rule maintenance
- −Cloud and support pricing not published; costs emerge during negotiation
Sources & method
Analyzed 10/05/2026 - 13 sources - Actively patched, but the product itself logged multiple critical RCE CVEs in 2025-2026; run it patched and network-isolated.
official x3review x5security x3news x2
- CVE-2025-24016, Critical remote code execution via unsafe deserialization; public PoC exists; addressed in a vendor advisory.
- CVE-2025-62786, Heap-based remote code execution vulnerability in Wazuh.
- CVE-2026-25769, Critical remote code execution via unsafe deserialization.
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.