B-hive
Depends
Confidence: Low
Buy only if you are a corporate grantmaker already committed to Benevity's ecosystem; small funders should use a spreadsheet or a lighter tool like Submittable.
New check
Comparison
B-hive and Submittable both land on Depends.
Buy only if you are a corporate grantmaker already committed to Benevity's ecosystem; small funders should use a spreadsheet or a lighter tool like Submittable.
Buy if you run grant programs, contests, or application cycles with real reviewer workflows . 11,000+ organizations do.
| Compare | B-hive | Submittable |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Corporate grantmakers with high application volume | Grantmakers and CSR teams |
| Who it's not for | Small funders granting a few times a year . spreadsheet is enough | Anyone needing a basic form or contact list |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.13 |
| Support quality | Help center exists; quality unknown | 'Excellent customer service' per Software Advice reviewers |
| Public sentiment | No independent user reviews of Benevity's B-Hive surfaced; most online 'b-hive' reviews cover Broadvoice's communicator or Orbit's B-hyve sprinkler controller.⁴ | Organizations praise the workflow tooling and support, while writers and small magazines complain about fees and some feature limits.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Guess: quote-only pricing means budget discovery happens in sales calls, not on the site¹ | Costs scale badly for small journals; CLMP discount only for qualifying literary orgs.16 |