Bun
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Try Bun for new JS/TS projects, scripts, and tooling . it is free, fast, and npm-compatible.
Comparison
Bun and Deno both land on Depends.
Try Bun for new JS/TS projects, scripts, and tooling . it is free, fast, and npm-compatible.
Buy for new TypeScript projects wanting a batteries-included runtime with edge hosting.
| Compare | Bun | Deno |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | New JS/TS projects wanting one fast toolchain | New TypeScript-first projects |
| Who it's not for | Production-critical apps that cannot absorb runtime churn | Teams migrating large Node codebases expecting zero friction |
| Privacy | Two recent CVEs (command injection, trusted-dependencies spoofing) plus active malware campaigns abusing the runtime. | Permission-model runtime with real 2026 CVEs (auth bypass, info disclosure); secure-by-default claims questioned by academic studies. |
| Support quality | Post-acquisition support called limited and deprecated | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Users praise Bun's speed and resource efficiency, but the 1.4 Rust rewrite and post-acquisition support draw criticism.¹ | Users like Deno's built-in TypeScript and developer experience but report migration friction, npm incompatibilities, and a smaller ecosystem than Node. |
| Biggest gotcha | Acquired December 2025 with zero revenue; priorities may shift toward Anthropic's goals.⁶ | Permission sandbox has real bypass CVEs; not a hard security boundary |