CATS Applicant Tracking System (ATS) & Recruiting Software
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run a recruiting agency or an SMB hiring constantly and will actually use the customization.
New check
Comparison
CATS Applicant Tracking System (ATS) & Recruiting Software and Klearskill both land on Depends.
Buy if you run a recruiting agency or an SMB hiring constantly and will actually use the customization.
Small hiring teams flooded with CVs get unlimited AI screening at $10 monthly, a low-risk trial.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Recruiting agencies | Startup hiring teams |
| Who it's not for | Solo founders hiring once or twice a year | Guess: Enterprises needing SOC 2 reports and vendor audits |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.10 | Vendor publishes privacy policy, terms, and a security page; no independent audit evidence appears in sources.14 |
| Support quality | Users praise responsive customer service | No support evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Reviewers rate CATS 4.2/5 on Capterra, praising responsive support and customization, while cost comparisons flag it as pricier than alternatives.¹ | Independent user reviews stay scarce; most coverage is vendor content, comparison listings, and founder posts.15 |
| Biggest gotcha | Entry pricing ($50-$89/user monthly) is mid-market; simpler rivals cost less for small teams⁵ | New pricing launched recently; confirm current plan limits before you commit. |