Checkmarx
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you are a large organization with dedicated security staff that needs enterprise-grade SAST, SCA, and agentic AI scanning in one platform.
Comparison
Checkmarx and StackHawk, Inc. both land on Depends.
Buy if you are a large organization with dedicated security staff that needs enterprise-grade SAST, SCA, and agentic AI scanning in one platform.
Buy if your team ships live web apps or APIs . especially AI-generated code . and wants DAST wired into CI/CD.
| Compare | Checkmarx | StackHawk, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Enterprise dev teams at scale | Teams shipping AI-generated code |
| Who it's not for | Small teams and startups . heavy overkill | Teams needing only SAST/SCA static code scanning |
| Privacy | Confirmed supply chain attack in March 2026 with stolen data; Checkmarx published ongoing incident updates through July 2026.11 | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Only truncated third-party mentions found | Users call onboarding and support team amazing. |
| Public sentiment | Reviews trend positive, with praise for ease of use offset by complaints about slow scans and sales friction.¹ | Users praise easy integration, developer-friendly workflow, and strong onboarding support.¹ |
| Biggest gotcha | March 2026 supply chain attack: data confirmed stolen; run vendor risk review11 | Pro listed at ~$42/mo on third-party sites; confirm current pricing and scan limits. |