ClockShark
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if you run construction or field-service crews that need mobile, GPS-backed time tracking with payroll integrations.
Comparison
ClockShark and Buddy Punch both land on Depends.
Buy it if you run construction or field-service crews that need mobile, GPS-backed time tracking with payroll integrations.
Buy it if you run an SMB with hourly or field workers who need punch verification, scheduling, and payroll together.
| Compare | ClockShark | Buddy Punch |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Construction and roofing crews | SMBs with hourly, deskless workers |
| Who it's not for | Office-only teams . mobile GPS clock features are dead weight | Healthcare orgs needing HIPAA compliance |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; reviewers note encryption in use, but a dedicated public security page was not found at | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; encryption and MFA reported, but Buddy Punch is not HIPAA compliant. |
| Support quality | No support-quality evidence in reviewed sources | No evidence in sources |
| Public sentiment | Reviews across G2, SelectHub, and Reddit generally describe ClockShark as user-friendly for field crews, with app-store feedback and switcher threads noting some frustration.⁴ | Users praise Buddy Punch as clean, focused, and dependable for hourly teams, while critics flag the base fee, add-on pricing, and a middling 6.0/10 expert score. |
| Biggest gotcha | Only two plans listed; exact per-user costs not exposed in reviewed sources . confirm before committing³ | $19 base fee sits on top of monthly user fees . painful for very small teams.15 |