shouldiuse.io

Comparison

Feedly Threat Intelligence vs Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM)

Feedly Threat Intelligence and Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) both land on Depends.

Feedly Threat Intelligence versus Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM)
CompareFeedly Threat IntelligenceFiligran (OpenCTI / XTM)
VerdictDependsDepends
Best forDedicated CTI teamsSOC and threat-intel teams
Who it's not forSmall teams that just need threat news . free RSS feeds and alerts sufficeSmall businesses with no dedicated security staff
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Support qualityNo support evidence in sourcesNo evidence in reviewed sources
Public sentimentReviewers on Gartner and Software Advice praise it as an effective, customizable tool for ingesting and scanning global threat information.²Reddit threat-intel communities actively evaluate and debate OpenCTI as a TIP, and G2 reviewers rate Filigran 4.6/5.
Biggest gotchaPricing undisclosed; vendor pushes a 30-day trial, then a sales conversation. Set budget expectations first.Enterprise pricing is quote-only via private AWS Marketplace offers; no list prices16

Pick Feedly Threat Intelligence when

  • Dedicated CTI teams
  • SOC teams tracking threat actors and IoCs
  • Orgs with defined intelligence requirements (PIRs)
  • Vulnerability and patch-prioritization watchers

When Feedly Threat Intelligence is not a fit

  • Small teams that just need threat news . free RSS feeds and alerts suffice
  • Solo analysts wanting cheap reading . plain Feedly does that for far less
  • Companies with no security function to act on the intel
  • Buyers needing transparent pricing before talking to sales

Pick Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) when

  • SOC and threat-intel teams
  • MSSPs managing multi-client intel
  • Orgs wanting self-hosted open-source TIP
  • Purple teams running attack simulations

When Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) is not a fit

  • Small businesses with no dedicated security staff
  • Teams wanting simple plug-and-play threat feeds
  • Buyers who need published, transparent pricing
  • Companies without analyst time to curate intel

Sources

  1. official
  2. review
  3. review
  4. security
  5. official
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. official
  11. news
  12. news
  13. review
  14. review
  15. review
  16. official