Octoparse
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy it if you're a non-coder scraping straightforward sites occasionally . start on the free plan and upgrade only if it holds up.
Comparison
Octoparse and Gumloop both land on Depends.
Buy it if you're a non-coder scraping straightforward sites occasionally . start on the free plan and upgrade only if it holds up.
Buy it if your team builds multi-step AI workflows at scale and wants IT-governed access and compliance.
| Compare | Octoparse | Gumloop |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Non-coders scraping simple, static sites | Marketing and ops teams automating research and data workflows |
| Who it's not for | Developers . a Python script beats it | Anyone needing 1-2 simple automations . use Zapier instead |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.11 | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, and HIPAA-compliant with Microsoft 365 certification.16 |
| Support quality | Reviewers describe support as extremely helpful | No usable data in reviewed sources |
| Public sentiment | Opinion is split: praise for no-code scraping on simple sites, sharp complaints about auto-detection, stability, and billing.³ | Users consistently praise how easy Gumloop makes building AI workflows, while noting it can feel heavy and credit costs grow with usage.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | Plans gate by seats and tasks; overages inflate the bill fast10 | Credit-based model: AI-heavy runs burn credits fast; model per-run costs first. |