OneDev
Depends
Confidence: Low
Buy if you specifically need a self-hosted GitHub alternative and have someone to run and patch it; independent evidence is thin, so confidence is low.
Comparison
OneDev and Gitea both land on Depends.
Buy if you specifically need a self-hosted GitHub alternative and have someone to run and patch it; independent evidence is thin, so confidence is low.
Buy if you want a lightweight, self-hosted GitHub-style forge and can run and patch your own server.
| Compare | OneDev | Gitea |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Self-hosting teams avoiding per-seat SaaS fees | Self-hosters with basic ops skills |
| Who it's not for | Open-source projects needing GitHub discovery and drive-by contributors | Teams wanting zero-maintenance managed hosting |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.¹ | Vendor states all published CVEs are fixed in the latest stable release; no specific incidents detailed in sources reviewed.⁷ |
| Support quality | No support evidence in sources | Priority fixes only on paid cloud |
| Public sentiment | Only vendor-published testimonials appeared; no independent user reviews were found in the sources reviewed.¹ | No independent user reviews were found; the praise in evidence is vendor marketing copy.⁴ |
| Biggest gotcha | Free self-host hides real costs: your time for upgrades, backups, patching³ | Cloud pricing unpublished; expect a contact-sales conversation for real numbers⁸ |