PhishTank
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Use it if you run a SIEM or SOAR (Splunk, ServiceNow, TheHive) and want a free extra phishing signal for enrichment.
New check
Comparison
PhishTank vs OpticParse
PhishTank and OpticParse both land on Depends.
OpticParse
Depends
Confidence: Low
AI agent developers who need live web data without CSS selectors buy this, and the free trial keeps testing cheap.
| Compare | ||
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | SOC and threat-intel teams | AI agent developers |
| Who it's not for | Small businesses wanting end-user phishing protection | Enterprises needing SLAs and vendor audits |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | No public security page (404); a crewAI issue flags credential risk when scraped secrets enter agent memory stores.16 |
| Support quality | False-positive removal complaints go unanswered. | Solo founder, no support evidence |
| Public sentiment | Security teams still plug the free feed into Splunk and ServiceNow, but users complain about false positives and slow delisting.⁵ | No independent user reviews found; available sources are directory listings and the founder's own posts. |
| Biggest gotcha | A false listing can get your domain suspended; delisting is slow and unresponsive.⁶ | Datasets sell per purchase from $99; repeated snapshots multiply costs fast |
Pick PhishTank when
- SOC and threat-intel teams
- Splunk/ServiceNow enrichment
- Phishing-detection researchers
- Network admins feeding blocklists
When PhishTank is not a fit
- Small businesses wanting end-user phishing protection
- Site owners needing fast delisting from a false flag
- Anyone needing an SLA-backed commercial feed
- Teams wanting a sole source of truth for blocking
Pick OpticParse when
- AI agent developers
- MCP and LangChain builders
- Competitive pricing monitors
- Data teams buying datasets without proxies
When OpticParse is not a fit
- Enterprises needing SLAs and vendor audits
- Compliance-sensitive teams; scraping risk stays with you
- Non-technical teams wanting a support desk
- Buyers who demand proven independent reviews
Sources
- PhishTank FAQphishtank.netofficial
- PhishTank . Wikipediaen.wikipedia.orgofficial
- PhishTank on Splunkbasesplunkbase.splunk.comofficial
- ServiceNow PhishTank Integrationstore.servicenow.comofficial
- Phishtank won't remove my legit websitereddit.comreview
- Somebody reported my blog to Phishtanknamepros.comreview
- Why Phishtank should be deprecatedlinkedin.comnews
review
- PhishTank vs URLhaus comparisoncybersectools.comnews
- What happened to phishtank?reddit.comreview
- PhishTank removal services overviewunflagdomain.comnews
- Top 8 Phishing Feeds Comparedbolster.ainews
review
- OpticParse . Universal HyperLocal AI Vision Web Scraperopticparse.comofficial
- Product security page (404)opticparse.comsecurity
security