Skypack
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Fine for prototypes, demos, and Deno imports where a free CDN URL beats installing anything.
New check
Comparison
Skypack and ESM>CDN (esm.sh) both land on Depends.
Fine for prototypes, demos, and Deno imports where a free CDN URL beats installing anything.
Free and excellent for prototypes, demos, and Deno projects . import any npm package by URL with no build step.
| Compare | Skypack | ESM>CDN (esm.sh) |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | No-build prototypes and demos | Zero-build prototypes and demos |
| Who it's not for | Production apps needing uptime SLAs or vendor contracts | Production apps needing uptime SLAs or guarantees |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.² | Two 2025 CVEs (path traversal pre-v136, full-response SSRF in v136); no public security page.15 |
| Support quality | No support evidence found | No support evidence found |
| Public sentiment | Mentions are mostly directory listings and dated community posts praising the no-install CDN approach; recent first-hand feedback is scarce.³ | Developers . especially in the Deno community . like the zero-build npm-by-URL workflow but report occasional package-resolution bugs.13 |
| Biggest gotcha | Free forever with no paid tier means no revenue; long-term availability is unproven.⁵ | Runtime dependency: outages or CVEs hit your users directly, not your repo |