Sortlist
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Fine as a free agency-search tool for buyers, since clients pay nothing.
New check
Comparison
Sortlist and LeadrPro both land on Depends.
Fine as a free agency-search tool for buyers, since clients pay nothing.
A pay-per-demo marketplace: B2B software sellers pay per booked meeting, buyers get paid ~$75 to take demos.
| Compare | Sortlist | LeadrPro |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Clients hiring marketing agencies for free | B2B SaaS sellers testing demand fast |
| Who it's not for | Agencies wanting transparent, published pricing | Small teams wanting a simple CRM or spreadsheet |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Users report account disputes, poor resolution | No direct support evidence found. |
| Public sentiment | Feedback splits by side: buyers get a free matching service, while agencies and some reviewers complain about lead quality, hidden pricing, and account practices.³ | Feedback is split: some early users rate it highly, but G2 reviewers cite poor usability and Reddit threads question whether the platform is still operational.14 |
| Biggest gotcha | Agencies report difficulty leaving; account lock-in complaints⁶ | Buyer cash incentives ($75/meeting, $10 promos) attract demo-takers who never intend to buy |