Comparison

Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs vs PrimeFaces

Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs and PrimeFaces both land on Depends.

Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs

Depends

Confidence: Low

Buy it if you build serious .NET, Blazor, or data-heavy web apps that need grids, charts, schedulers, and document generation in one bundle.

Depends

Confidence: Medium

Buy only if your team is already committed to JSF/Jakarta Faces and wants a mature, free component suite.

Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs versus PrimeFaces
Compare	Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs	PrimeFaces
Verdict	Depends	Depends
Best for	.NET and Blazor line-of-business apps	Existing JSF/Jakarta Faces shops
Who it's not for	Simple sites needing a dropdown and a modal	Greenfield web apps . JSF is a dated stack
Privacy	No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.^²	Multiple public CVEs, including a documented RCE in 5.x-6.0 . stay current and audit old deployments.¹¹
Support quality	No support evidence in sources	Paid Elite tier exists; users needed outside experts
Public sentiment	Independent developer voices are scarce in these sources; forum posts confirm real-world Syncfusion grid usage.^⁵	Developers value the component breadth but describe a heavy, dated experience with a real learning curve.¹³
Biggest gotcha	Prices absent from every reviewed source despite 'clear, simple pricing' claim^¹	Major-version upgrades break things: widgetVars rendering broke for teams moving to v14