shouldiuse.io

Comparison

Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs vs Telerik

Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs and Telerik both land on Depends.

Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs versus Telerik
CompareSyncfusion UI Components & Document SDKsTelerik
VerdictDependsDepends
Best for.NET and Blazor line-of-business appsEnterprise .NET teams
Who it's not forSimple sites needing a dropdown and a modalSolo devs and hobby projects
PrivacyNo known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.²Flagged: repeated high-severity CVEs including unauthenticated RCE . patching discipline is mandatory.14
Support qualityNo support evidence in sourcesPraised by some, panned in WinForms
Public sentimentIndependent developer voices are scarce in these sources; forum posts confirm real-world Syncfusion grid usage.⁵Users praise component breadth and support in some suites, while criticizing licensing changes, performance, and support gaps in others.⁹
Biggest gotchaPrices absent from every reviewed source despite 'clear, simple pricing' claim¹Perpetual licenses dropped . recurring subscription cost for the life of the app10

Pick Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs when

  • .NET and Blazor line-of-business apps
  • Data-heavy dashboards: grids, charts, schedulers
  • Apps generating PDF/Word/Excel documents
  • Shops mixing React, Angular, and .NET

When Syncfusion UI Components & Document SDKs is not a fit

  • Simple sites needing a dropdown and a modal
  • Small teams happy with free open-source components
  • Buyers who need real prices before talking to sales
  • Anyone uncomfortable with vendor lock-in on core UI

Pick Telerik when

  • Enterprise .NET teams
  • Data-heavy internal apps
  • Blazor and ASP.NET shops
  • Teams needing built-in reporting

When Telerik is not a fit

  • Solo devs and hobby projects
  • Small apps fine with free libraries
  • Teams that won't patch CVEs promptly
  • Buyers who need perpetual licenses

Sources

  1. Syncfusion homepagesyncfusion.com
    official
  2. Syncfusion security page scansyncfusion.com
    security
  3. GitHub description of Syncfusion component suitegithub.com
    official
  4. Telerik vs. Syncfusion: Blazor Long-Term Developmenttelerik.com
    review
  5. Bytes forum . third-party grids threadpost.bytes.com
    review
  6. Alibre forum . AtomFem threadalibre.com
    review
  7. LinkedIn . Syncfusion special pricing postlinkedin.com
    news
  8. Telerik.com homepagetelerik.com
    official
  9. Progress Telerik Reviews . Trustpilottrustpilot.com
    review
  10. Telerik discontinued perpetual licensing . Reddit r/dotnetreddit.com
    review
  11. Experience with Telerik, Fluent, MudBlazor . Reddit r/Blazorreddit.com
    review
  12. Telerik UI Reviews . Gartner Peer Insightsgartner.com
    review
  13. Critical RCE chain bulletin, UI for AJAXtelerik.com
    security
  14. CVE-2026-13185 advisory . CCB Belgiumccb.belgium.be
    security
  15. CISA KEV: CVE-2019-18935 . Picus Securitypicussecurity.com
    security
  16. Telerik . Wikipedia (Progress acquisition)en.wikipedia.org
    news