ThreatQ Threat Intelligence Platform (ThreatQuotient)
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Fit for organizations running a staffed SOC or dedicated threat intel team with enterprise budget.
Comparison
ThreatQ Threat Intelligence Platform (ThreatQuotient) vs Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM)
ThreatQ Threat Intelligence Platform (ThreatQuotient) and Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) both land on Depends.
Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM)
Depends
Confidence: Medium
Buy if you run a staffed SOC or threat-intel function and want an open-source, self-hostable platform with strong ratings.
| Compare | ThreatQ Threat Intelligence Platform (ThreatQuotient) | Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Staffed enterprise SOC teams | SOC and threat-intel teams |
| Who it's not for | Small businesses without a SOC | Small businesses with no dedicated security staff |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.⁸ | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. |
| Support quality | Only docs site found; no support reviews. | No evidence in reviewed sources |
| Public sentiment | Gartner Peer Insights shows 11 verified reviews, but the sources contain no quotable user feedback.² | Reddit threat-intel communities actively evaluate and debate OpenCTI as a TIP, and G2 reviewers rate Filigran 4.6/5.10 |
| Biggest gotcha | Quote-only pricing means no budget benchmarking before the sales call.¹ | Enterprise pricing is quote-only via private AWS Marketplace offers; no list prices |
Pick ThreatQ Threat Intelligence Platform (ThreatQuotient) when
- Staffed enterprise SOC teams
- Dedicated threat intel analysts
- Multi-source feed aggregation and scoring
- CrowdStrike-centric security stacks
When ThreatQ Threat Intelligence Platform (ThreatQuotient) is not a fit
- Small businesses without a SOC
- Teams with no analysts to curate intel
- Buyers needing transparent self-serve pricing
- Solo security IT generalists
Pick Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) when
- SOC and threat-intel teams
- MSSPs managing multi-client intel
- Orgs wanting self-hosted open-source TIP
- Purple teams running attack simulations
When Filigran (OpenCTI / XTM) is not a fit
- Small businesses with no dedicated security staff
- Teams wanting simple plug-and-play threat feeds
- Buyers who need published, transparent pricing
- Companies without analyst time to curate intel
Sources
- ThreatQ official sitethreatq.comofficial
- ThreatQ Reviews . Gartner Peer Insightsgartner.comreview
- ThreatQ on CrowdStrike Marketplacemarketplace.crowdstrike.comofficial
- ThreatQ Helpcenter . integration docshelpcenter.threatq.comofficial
- Securonix ThreatQ overviewsecuronix.comnews
- ThreatQuotient company overviewingecom.netnews
- Cybersecurity Excellence Awards . ThreatQcybersecurity-excellence-awards.comnews
- Gridinsoft threatq.com reviewgridinsoft.comsecurity
- threatq.com/securitythreatq.comsecurity
review
official
- Filigran Raises $58 Million in Series C Fundingsecurityweek.comnews
- OpenCTI maker Filigran raises $16Mtechcrunch.comnews
review