Pulley
Depends
Confidence: Low
Only worth a demo if slow permits are bleeding your projects; there is no public pricing, no user reviews, and no security page to vet beforehand.
Comparison
Pulley and Accela both land on Depends.
Only worth a demo if slow permits are bleeding your projects; there is no public pricing, no user reviews, and no security page to vet beforehand.
Buy only if you are a large city or county with complex permitting workflows, dedicated admins, and a multi-year budget.
| Compare | Pulley | Accela |
|---|---|---|
| Verdict | Depends | Depends |
| Best for | Builders stuck in multi-month permit waits | Large city and county permitting departments |
| Who it's not for | Guess: One-off projects . a local permit expediter is simpler and cheaper | Small towns with a handful of permits |
| Privacy | No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.³ | Multiple public findings: a 2025 RCE CVE, a CERT/CC advisory, and a reported 2026 breach exposing ~1TB.⁹ |
| Support quality | Promises expert judgment; unverified by users | User complaints; integrations pushed to middleware |
| Public sentiment | No verifiable user reviews exist for the permitting product; reviews under this name describe an unrelated cap table software company.⁴ | Public reviews are sparse and mixed: agencies praise the breadth while a contractor thread calls a city rollout the greatest software blunder of their time.⁷ |
| Biggest gotcha | Search results are polluted: cap table Pulley shut down Dec 2026 . different company, do not conflate⁵ | On-premise to cloud migrations are budgeted, multi-year projects, not quick upgrades12 |