VERDICT
Depends
Should I use 465cal?
Photo Calorie Tracker: Review Meals From Pictures - 465cal.com
· 2 days ago
Buy 465Cal if you want fast photo-based calorie logging and accept a new, unproven indie app. Skip it if you want established ratings, verified micronutrient depth, or a published paid price.
Low. Based on 14 public sources. Most review-style content comes from 465Cal's own site, so third-party validation is thin.
$0
Free Plan
medium
Paid tier price is not published in reviewed sources; confirm cost before subscribing.
medium
New app with unproven long-term update and support track record.
medium
AI estimates need manual review and editing; publisher acknowledges accuracy limits.
low
Data export path unclear; identity verification required for data deletion requests.
Value for money: 3/5
Rating
$0
Starting price
12
Sources
Analyzed
$0
Not disclosed
No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Independent user feedback is scarce; one Instagram post praises the app's plate analysis.
“Tell me you have heard about 465cal yet! This app will analyze what's on your plate before your eyes, count cal”
Compare 465cal with each alternative.
Established tracker with a huge food database.
Deeper micronutrient tracking; 465Cal's own page concedes this.
Guess: photo-first competitor with a longer track record.
Free manual logging if AI estimates feel unreliable.
Based on 14 public sources. Most review-style content comes from 465Cal's own site, so third-party validation is thin.
Free-tier AI photo calorie tracker from a new indie dev. Price undisclosed, ratings thin, most reviews self-published.
Based on 14 public sources. Most review-style content comes from 465Cal's own site, so third-party validation is thin.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.