shouldiuse.io

New check

Categories

VERDICT

Should I use Actitime?

NEW[Reclaim your time — learn the time management strategies that actually work >>>](/time-management-training) - actitime.com

Depends. Buy if you run a small-to-mid agency or consultancy that bills hours and wants tracking, billing, and reports in one tool. Skip if you're solo, want passive automatic monitoring, or chafe at per-user pricing.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated, so exact paid-tier prices and support quality could not be verified.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Paid plansNot confirmed in sources

Best for

  • Agencies billing hourly
  • Consultancies tracking project profitability
  • Nonprofits logging volunteer hours
  • Remote teams needing timesheets

Not for

  • Solo users — a spreadsheet is cheaper and faster
  • Teams wanting passive automatic monitoring, Time Doctor-style
  • Large orgs needing unlimited users without per-seat creep

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Per-user pricing compounds with headcount; cheaper-tier user limits push upgrades

low

Self-hosted plan means you own patching and security yourself

low

Exact paid-tier prices not visible in sources; confirm current rates before committing

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Strong review ratings (Capterra 4.9/5)
  • Free tier with billing and reporting
  • Time tracking, billing, and project reports in one tool
  • Self-hosted deployment available for on-premises control
  • Real case studies from IT consultancies

Cons

  • Connecteam's independent review lands a middling 6.9
  • Reddit users openly question if it's worth the price
  • Vendor publishes its own competitor 'reviews' — biased content
  • Modest review footprint: only 52 G2 reviews

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/26/2026 - 13 sources - No recent product CVEs found; old 2010/2015 advisories exist and 478 stealer-log credentials are tied to the domain. Vendor publishes a security policy and DPA.

official x4review x6security x2news x1
  • actiTIME 2015.2 Multiple Vulnerabilities, Public Zero Science Lab advisory against the 2015.2 web timesheet; predates the current product.
  • actiTIME privilege escalation (2010), Old Packet Storm exploit listing for privilege issues in a 2010 version.
  • 478 infostealer credentials tied to domain, Hudson Rock lists 478 credentials associated with in stealer logs — compromised credentials linked to the domain, not a product flaw.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Reddit users question whether price is worth it
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Users repeatedly call it easy to use
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Tracking, billing, reporting, leave, self-hosted in one
  • Support quality. No support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. Dated vulns and stealer-log hits; program exists
  • 4.9/5 Capterra rating as cited in Apploye's 2026 roundup
  • 6.9 Connecteam score independent review verdict, 2024
  • Yes Free tier free plan with billing and reports
  • $3.8M Est. ARR bootstrapped, Canada-based (GetLatka, 2024)

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Basic time tracking
  • Billing and reports included per vendor page
  • Limits apply as team grows

Paid plans

Not confirmed in sources

  • Three paid tiers reported
  • Per-user pricing

Security

No recent product CVEs found; old 2010/2015 advisories exist and 478 stealer-log credentials are tied to the domain.

  • actiTIME 2015.2 Multiple VulnerabilitiesPublic Zero Science Lab advisory against the 2015.2 web timesheet; predates the current product.12
  • actiTIME privilege escalation (2010)Old Packet Storm exploit listing for privilege issues in a 2010 version.

Vendor publishes a security policy and DPA.

  • 478 infostealer credentials tied to domainHudson Rock lists 478 credentials associated with in stealer logs — compromised credentials linked to the domain, not a product flaw.13

Alternatives

Compare Actitime with each alternative.

  • Toggl Track

    Simpler, cheaper pick for basic time tracking

  • TimeCamp

    Close competitor; compare head-to-head on G2

    Actitime vs TimeCamp

  • Harvest

    Time tracking plus invoicing for small agencies

Companies that use it

  • Datamine
  • DSS Consulting
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated, so exact paid-tier prices and support quality could not be verified.

Solid mid-tier time tracker for billable teams; solo users overkill, per-user pricing and old security flags deserve a look.

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources; many review snippets were truncated, so exact paid-tier prices and support quality could not be verified.

Sources

  1. Honest ActiTIME Review: Pros, Cons, Features & Pricing (Connecteam)connecteam.com
    review
  2. actiTIME Reviews & Ratings (Capterra)capterra.com
    review
  3. actiTIME Reviews (G2)g2.com
    review
  4. actiTIME seller page, 52 reviews (G2)g2.com
    review
  5. Is actiTIME Worth the Price? (Reddit)reddit.com
    review
  6. Best actiTIME Alternatives (Apploye)apploye.com
    review
  7. actiTIME homepageactitime.com
    official
  8. actiTIME pricingactitime.com
    official
  9. Free time tracking software pageactitime.com
    official
  10. actiTIME Self-Hostedactitime.com
    official
  11. actiTIME, Inc Revenue (GetLatka)getlatka.com
    news
  12. actiTIME 2015.2 Multiple Vulnerabilitieszeroscience.mk
    security
  13. actiTIME infostealer credentials (Hudson Rock)hudsonrock.com
    security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.