VERDICT
Use Adaface coding, aptitude and psychometric tests to identify the most qualified candidates for 500+ roles. - adaface.com
Depends. Good fit for recruiters screening steady candidate volumes, especially tech and campus hiring, with a 4.6/5 G2 rating. Skip it if you hire rarely, need live video interviews, or want the cheapest per-candidate pricing.
Medium. Based on ~20 public sources; funding figures conflict between Tracxn ($250K) and CB Insights ($60K).
$180/year
Individual
medium
Individual plan is $180/year for just 12 credits — easy to outgrow fast
medium
~$15 per candidate cost draws criticism as poor value at scale
medium
Cheaper rivals exist: Testlify starts at $69/month
Value for money: 2/5
Rating
$180/year
Starting price
11
Sources
Analyzed
$180/year
Not published
Not disclosed
Publishes GDPR commitment, DPA, and security whitepaper.
No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Recruiters rate it highly on G2, but candidates and some reviewers report harsh tests, missing features, and weak reliability.
“Adaface is the worst exam.”
“Lacks basic features, not reliable”
“Adaface feels more practical than many”
Compare Adaface with each alternative.
Cheaper entry: $69/month, $1 per candidate claimed
Adaface vs TestlifyEstablished coding-test platform for engineering screening
Adaface vs CodilityRole-based assessments and take-home style tasks
Long-running aptitude and psychometric testing suite
Adaface vs Criteria (Criteria Corp)Based on ~20 public sources; funding figures conflict between Tracxn ($250K) and CB Insights ($60K).
Solid 4.6/5 screening platform for volume tech hiring; per-candidate pricing and missing basics hurt small, occasional hirers.
Based on ~20 public sources; funding figures conflict between Tracxn ($250K) and CB Insights ($60K).
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.