shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

AFFiNE Review

Depends

Should I use AFFiNE?

Open-source Notion & Miro alternative — docs, whiteboards, databases, and AI in one local-first workspace. - affine.pro

· 1 month ago

Buy if you're a solo user or tiny team wanting a free, privacy-first Notion+Miro hybrid and can tolerate rough edges. Skip it if you handle sensitive data or need stability — the RCE CVE and ignored security reports are disqualifying.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 20+ public sources; several review snippets truncated. Affine Analytics, Affine (NeuralShift legal AI), and affine.ai are different companies and were excluded.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Pro$6.75/mo
TeamQuote-based

Best for

  • Privacy-focused solo note-takers
  • Docs + whiteboard hybrid workflows
  • Self-hosters wanting open source
  • Budget-conscious 1–3 person teams

Not for

  • Teams handling sensitive data — RCE CVE, ignored XSS reports
  • Groups larger than 3 people on the free plan
  • Buyers who need true MIT licensing
  • Anyone needing a polished, stable daily-driver tool

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Open-source license is not MIT despite marketing framing; verify terms before commercial use

high

Slow response to reported security issues hints at weak support quality

medium

Free plan hard-caps 3 members and 3 devices; growing teams must upgrade quickly

medium

AI is a separate $8.90/month add-on, not included in Pro

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Docs, whiteboards, databases, and AI in one workspace
  • Local-first and privacy-focused; works offline
  • Generous free tier: 10 GB, 3 members, 3 devices
  • Pro costs only $6.75/month
  • Self-hostable; managed hosting available via

Cons

  • Recurring stability complaints across reviews
  • Called 'raw, unaligned, and pretty unsatisfying' by reviewers
  • Remote-code-execution CVE published in 2026
  • Critical XSS reports ignored for two months, researcher says
  • License criticized as misleading — not actually MIT

Sources & method

- 11 sources - Active 2026 CVEs include remote code execution; researchers report ignored XSS findings; no dedicated security page found.

official x2review x5security x3news x1
  • CVE-2026-21853, One-click remote code execution vulnerability in AFFiNE workspace.
  • CVE-2026-25477, Open redirect vulnerability.
  • CVE-2026-7702, Vulnerability detected in AFFiNE; details limited in sources reviewed.
  • Critical XSS reports allegedly ignored, Cybersecurity researcher says critical XSS vulnerabilities were ignored for about two months.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 11

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free tier generous; Pro just $6.75/mo
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Called raw and unsatisfying; stability complaints recur
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Docs, whiteboards, databases, AI in one app
  • Support quality: 2/5. Security reports allegedly ignored for months
  • Security posture: 2/5. RCE plus redirect CVEs; no security page
  • $6.75/mo Starting price Pro plan
  • Yes Free tier 10 GB, 3 members, 3 devices
  • $8.90/mo AI add-on Separate from Pro, 2024 listed price
  • $8M Funding Seed round, Oct 2023

Pricing

Free

$0

  • 10 GB storage
  • 3 members
  • 3 devices

Pro

$6.75/mo

  • Expanded limits
  • Individual use

Team

Quote-based

  • Team collaboration
  • Contact sales

Security

Active 2026 CVEs include remote code execution; researchers report ignored XSS findings; no dedicated security page found.

  • CVE-2026-21853One-click remote code execution vulnerability in AFFiNE workspace.⁸
  • CVE-2026-25477Open redirect vulnerability.⁹
  • CVE-2026-7702Vulnerability detected in AFFiNE; details limited in sources reviewed.
  • Critical XSS reports allegedly ignoredCybersecurity researcher says critical XSS vulnerabilities were ignored for about two months.10

What users say

Sentiment is split: privacy-minded fans praise the lightweight local-first design, while others complain it feels raw and unstable.

“It is a raw, unaligned, and pretty unsatisfying app.”
Product Hunt review
“PSA: Do Not Use Affine - Underhanded Nonsense”
Reddit, r/PKMS (thread title)
“Overall, AFFiNE is lightweight, privacy-forward, a…”
XDA Developers review
Full analysis

Based on 20+ public sources; several review snippets truncated. Affine Analytics, Affine (NeuralShift legal AI), and affine.ai are different companies and were excluded.

Free, feature-packed Notion+Miro hybrid — but stability gripes and ignored security reports make it risky for teams.

Methodology

Based on 20+ public sources; several review snippets truncated. Affine Analytics, Affine (NeuralShift legal AI), and affine.ai are different companies and were excluded.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. review
  4. AFFiNE Reviews (2026)producthunt.com
    review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. security
  9. security
  10. security
  11. news

Add this review to your site

This check for AFFiNE says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.