shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Aftermath?

Video games, the internet and what comes after - aftermath.site

Depends. Subscribe if you want to back independent games journalism from named veterans like Luke Plunkett. Don't if you're shopping for software, and sample the free feed first since no independent reviews of this outlet surfaced.

Confidence

Low. Based on ~90 public sources; only 1 directly concerns aftermath.site — the rest matched unrelated 'Aftermath' products (movies, an MTG set, a Jamf tool, a DEX).

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence in sources
  • Ease of useNo evidence; it is a publication
  • Feature depthNo evidence of scope beyond editorial focus
  • Support qualityNo support evidence for a media site
  • Security postureNo security findings either way

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Readers backing independent games journalism
  • Fans of Luke Plunkett's writing
  • Guess: readers of ex-Kotaku/Waypoint-style coverage

Not for

  • Software buyers — this is a publication, not a tool
  • Teams seeking a CRM, project management, or security product
  • Readers wanting big-outlet daily news scale
  • Vendors or IT buyers who need SLAs and security documentation

Gotchas - check before you buy

low

Media site, so no security page — fine for readers, but expect no vendor-grade security docs

low

Same name as unrelated products (movies, MTG set, Jamf IR tool) — verify you're reading about this one

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Veteran games writer Luke Plunkett publishes here (August 2024)
  • Clear editorial niche: games, internet culture, and industry aftermath

Cons

Not disclosed

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 3 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x1security x1news x1

Key stats

  • Not rated

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 3

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence in sources
  • Ease of use. No evidence; it is a publication
  • Feature depth. No evidence of scope beyond editorial focus
  • Support quality. No support evidence for a media site
  • Security posture. No security findings either way
  • Aug 2024 Earliest evidence Luke Plunkett article on the site
  • 1 of ~90 Usable sources found Rest matched other 'Aftermath' products
  • None found Security page Normal for a media site

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

No user reviews of this publication surfaced; nearly all reviewed sources matched unrelated products named 'Aftermath'.

Full analysis

Based on ~90 public sources; only 1 directly concerns aftermath.site — the rest matched unrelated 'Aftermath' products (movies, an MTG set, a Jamf tool, a DEX).

A reader-funded games/media site, not software: subscribe to support veteran writers, skip it if you came shopping for a tool.

Methodology

Based on ~90 public sources; only 1 directly concerns aftermath.site — the rest matched unrelated 'Aftermath' products (movies, an MTG set, a Jamf tool, a DEX).

Sources

  1. official
  2. news
  3. security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.