2012
Founded
Per Wikipedia
Report
Balanced news via media bias ratings
Worth it
Worth itBuy if you are an individual reader or teacher who wants the same story covered from left, right, and center in one place.
Free site showing the same story from left, right, and center; good for readers and teachers, but critics say its ratings lean.
2012
Founded
Per Wikipedia
Yes
Free access
Funded by Sustaining Members
Public benefit corporation
Ownership
Per AllSides About page
~35% left, 38% right
Audience split
Self-reported on Wefunder
Free content; optional paid memberships
Bias ratings, balanced feeds, mobile apps
Disclosed 2024 incident; no security page
Free tier: Yes
No vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; AllSides disclosed an unspecified security incident in May 2024, and no dedicated security page was found.
Users like seeing the same story across the political spectrum, but several argue AllSides' own bias ratings lean.
“I’m happy with AllSides and find it helpfu”
“The website “allsides” for unbiased news has a bias itself.”
“The AllSides website shows articles from left, right, and center news sources on the SAME topics.”
Compare AllSides with each alternative.
Listed as the top AllSides alternative on AlternativeTo.
Guess: bias ratings and blindspot comparisons; the better-known AllSides rival.
AllSides vs Ground NewsGuess: if you just want one clean feed without bias labels.
Based on ~25 public sources; most snippets were truncated, and no aggregate star ratings were found.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.