54%
Negative lead-quality reviews
of Angi Pro reviews, per SAVU analysis
Report
Depends
DependsHomeowners can justify free review browsing and cost guides, then book directly.
Homeowners: fine for free review browsing. Contractors: 54% negative lead-quality reviews, stacked fees — don't buy leads.
54%
Negative lead-quality reviews
of Angi Pro reviews, per SAVU analysis
~$30/mo
Angi Key membership
homeowner membership tier
Yes
Free for homeowners
browsing reviews and cost guides
IAC-controlled
Ownership
public company, ticker ANGI
Lead fees widely called expensive; costs exceed ad spend
Huge marketplace, thin tools for pros
Users report fee fights and indifferent support
Vulnerability disclosure policy exists; no known breaches
Free
~$30/month
Per lead, varies by trade
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Reviews skew sharply negative, especially from contractors citing lead quality, stacked fees, and billing disputes.
“This service is a complete joke!!”
“Never use Angi. Angi is designed to be a scam.”
“Angi's list is CRAP! They just want your money and don't care”
Compare Angi with each alternative.
Lead alternative bundling project management for contractors
Angi vs Houzz ProRun your own bookings instead of renting leads
Angi vs Housecall ProPay-per-lead rival; compare costs before committing
Angi vs ThumbtackCRM and quoting for service businesses, no lead marketplace
Angi vs JobberBased on 30+ public sources: Trustpilot, Reddit, ConsumerAffairs, SEC filing, Vermont AG settlement, and contractor-industry reviews.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.