shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Aparchive?

Not disclosed - aparchive.com

Depends. Buy if you produce broadcasts, documentaries, or news content and need licensed AP archival footage with sales support. Skip it if you want transparent prices, instant checkout, or occasional cheap clips.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~14 public sources; no independent review platforms found.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence found
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence found
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityOnly sales contacts; no support evidence
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Broadcasters licensing news footage
  • Documentary filmmakers
  • News publishers using AP syndication
  • Researchers verifying historical events

Not for

  • Small creators wanting cheap stock clips
  • Anyone needing transparent self-serve pricing
  • Projects without a licensing budget
  • Teams expecting instant checkout

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

YouTube uploads are previews; commercial reuse still requires a license.

medium

No published prices; every clip is quoted per project via sales.

medium

No security page published; request documentation before enterprise deals.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Operated by the Associated Press, founded 1846
  • Licensing available via AP Archive and AP Newsroom
  • Content promoted through an active AP Archive YouTube channel
  • Dedicated UK and US sales contacts for licensing inquiries
  • Press Association partnership broadens available footage

Cons

  • No public pricing; purchases go through sales quotes
  • No public security page found on the site
  • Sparse independent reviews; little published user feedback
  • Licensing takes multiple steps; no instant checkout

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed. Site publishes no security page.

official x3review x2security x1news x3

Key stats

  • Feature depth: 5/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence found
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence found
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Century-deep AP news footage archive
  • Support quality. Only sales contacts; no support evidence
  • Security posture: 2/5. No public security page found
  • 1846 Operator founded The Associated Press
  • Not published Public pricing Sales-quote licensing model

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

Site publishes no security page.

What users say

Independent reviews are nearly absent; AP Archive mostly surfaces in Reddit threads as a way to trace historical clips.

“I googled that reference”
Reddit, r/videos

Companies that use it

  • Lufkin Daily News
  • Mississippi Valley Publishing
Full analysis

Based on ~14 public sources; no independent review platforms found.

Licensed AP news footage archive for media pros; sales-quoted pricing, no self-serve checkout, sparse reviews.

Methodology

Based on ~14 public sources; no independent review platforms found.

Sources

  1. AP Archiveaparchive.com
    official
  2. AP Newsroom — Archival Photos & Video Footage Licensingnewsroom.ap.org
    official
  3. Associated Press — Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
    news
  4. AP Archive security page (not found)aparchive.com
    security
  5. 3 Ways to License Content from Associated Press — wikiHowwikihow.com
    review
  6. AP Archive YouTube channelyoutube.com
    official
  7. Press Association and Associated Press join forcesfocalint.org
    news
  8. The Associated Press 1-Minute Archive Film Competitionsheffdocfest.com
    news
  9. Reddit r/videos thread referencing AP Archivereddit.com
    review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.