$1/mo
Starting price
plus ~$0.001 per PDF (third-party review)
Report
Should I Use API2PDF?
Simplest and cheapest REST API to generate PDF from HTML, Office Docs, and merge PDFs
Worth it
Worth itBuy if you're a developer who just needs a cheap, no-fuss REST API for HTML-to-PDF and document conversion.
Dirt-cheap REST API for PDF generation; great for developers, wrong for non-technical teams or template-heavy workflows.
Confidence: Medium
Yes
Free tier
"Get started for free"
$848.3K
Projected revenue
Crunchbase estimate — small vendor
Value for money
5
Positioned cheapest in category; $1/mo base.
Ease of use
4
Client libraries for .NET, PHP, Python, Node, Salesforce.
Feature depth
3
Basic conversion utility; no template engine.
Security posture
3
HIPAA support claimed; auto-delete; no security page.
Pros
- Pay-as-you-go: $1/month base plus $0.001 per PDF per one comparison.⁷
- Free tier to start; no stated limits on PDF file size.³
- Official client libraries for PHP, .NET, Python, Node, and Salesforce.
- Publishes HIPAA compliance guidance for healthcare PDF generation.⁴
- Generated files are auto-deleted by default, limiting data retention.
Cons
- Wrapper around open-source engines like wkhtmltopdf; inherits their quirks.
- Described by a competitor as a basic converter with no templates.⁹
- No dedicated security page published on its own site.⁵
- Complex HTML/CSS rendering issues may require support escalation.
- Terms of service allow API2PDF to suspend your access.⁶
Gotchas
- mediumCompetitor estimates ~$0.005/PDF; costs accumulate at scale. Model your volume first.⁸
- mediumHeavy workloads require switching to V2 XL endpoints — confirm your tier before committing.³
- lowPDFs auto-delete shortly after generation; retrieve and store output immediately.
- lowLookalike domain is flagged low-trust; the official site is.12
Best for
- Developers adding PDF export to apps
- Invoices, reports, proposals at low-to-mid volume
- Teams avoiding self-hosted wkhtmltopdf upkeep
- Budget-sensitive startups wanting pay-as-you-go
Not for
- Non-developers — it's an API only, no UI
- Teams needing template-based document workflows
- High-volume shops where per-PDF fees pile up
- Buyers wanting big-vendor scale and SLAs from a small team
Companies that use it
- Nintex
- PixieBrix
Pricing
Pay-as-you-go
$1/month base
- ~$0.001 per PDF per third-party review
- No stated file-size limits
- Free tier to start
Enterprise
Not disclosed
- V2 XL endpoints for more resources
- Serves large enterprise organizations
Security
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
What users say
Developers on Reddit use it for straightforward PDF generation jobs and treat it as a solid lightweight option alongside rivals.
“I am using https://www.api2pdf.com/ for a project”
Alternatives
Compare API2PDF with each alternative.
DocRaptor
Pricier, but strong templating and support.
API2PDF vs DocRaptorPDFShift
Direct HTML-to-PDF competitor with similar scope.
API2PDF vs PDFShiftIronPDF
Self-hosted .NET library; no per-PDF fees.
cloudlayer.io
Adds templates that API2PDF lacks.
API2PDF vs cloudlayer.ioFull analysis
Based on 40+ public sources; direct user reviews and support feedback are sparse.
Sources
- API2PDF homepageapi2pdf.comofficial
- Pricingapi2pdf.comofficial
- FAQapi2pdf.comofficial
- API2PDF and HIPAA Complianceapi2pdf.comsecurity
- Security page (not found)api2pdf.comsecurity
- Terms of Serviceapi2pdf.comofficial
- HTML2IMG API2PDF comparisonhtml2img.comreview
- IronPDF vs API2PDF .NET comparisonironsoftware.comreview
- cloudlayer.io API2PDF alternative pagecloudlayer.ioreview
- Reddit r/dotnet HTML-to-PDF threadreddit.comreview
- Crunchbase company profilecrunchbase.comnews
- ScamAdviser api2pdf.io checkscamadviser.comsecurity
Rate this review
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask a follow-up
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.