Buy if your team wants a cheaper all-in-one Postman replacement and accepts an early-stage vendor's security maturity. Skip it if you need enterprise-grade security posture, proven scale, or a deep ecosystem.
Confidence
Medium. Based on ~45 public sources; several review snippets were truncated and funding reports conflict.
Ratings
Value for money
Ease of use
Feature depth
Support qualityNo reliable evidence on support quality
Security posture
Pricing
$0
Free
ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Basic$9/user/month
Pro / EnterpriseContact vendor
Best for
→Startups and small teams replacing Postman on a budget
→API-first teams wanting docs, mocks, tests in one tool
→Design-first OpenAPI spec-driven workflows
→Solo developers on the free tier
Not for
×Enterprises needing proven security posture and vendor maturity
×Teams relying on a large community and plugin ecosystem
×Buyers uncomfortable with unclear funding and vendor longevity
×Quick one-off API testing — a lighter client is simpler
Gotchas - check before you buy
medium
Only the Basic tier ($9/user/month) is publicly priced; higher tiers need sales contact.
medium
Guess: projects live in Apidog's cloud; set an OpenAPI export routine to limit lock-in.
medium
A stored XSS CVE exists; confirm your client version includes the fix before heavy use.
low
Official Apidog subreddit was banned; community support beyond vendor channels looks limited.
Pros and cons
Pros
+All-in-one: design, debug, mock, test, and document APIs in one tool.
+Basic tier costs $9/user/month, well under Postman Team's $19 seat.
+Earns top G2 badges for API development and management categories.
+Reddit developers actively recommend it as a Postman alternative.
+Free tier available; marketed as free Postman alternative for teams.
Cons
−Third-party security posture grade is D+ (38/100).
−Stored XSS vulnerability CVE-2025-41085, rated medium risk.
−Thin enterprise adoption: just 2 Gartner reviews.
−Postman ranked #1 over Apidog in G2's first API platforms report.
−Funding reports conflict; vendor longevity and scale unproven.
Sources & method
- 14 sources - One medium-risk stored XSS CVE (CVE-2025-41085); third-party posture grade D+. No breaches reported.
official x2review x7security x3news x2
CVE-2025-41085 — Stored Cross-Site Scripting, Stored XSS in Apidog, rated medium risk; tracked by NVD.
Key stats
Value for money: 4/5
Rating
$0
Starting price
14
Sources
Analyzed
Value for money: 4/5. Undercuts Postman's $19 seat; users cite value
Ease of use: 4/5. Users consistently praise it across review sites
Feature depth: 5/5. Design, mock, test, docs, MCP in one platform
Support quality. No reliable evidence on support quality
5.is there any API testing tool better than postman? — Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/webdev/comments/1oel5ab/is_there_any_api_testing_tool_better_than_postman/
6.Keploy vs Apidog https://keploy.io/compare/apidog
Comments
One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.
No comments yet.