shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Astro?

Astro builds fast content sites, powerful web applications, dynamic server APIs, and everything in-between. - astro.build

Worth it. Use it if you have developers and a content-heavy site — it's free, open source, and developers call it fantastic. Skip it if you need no-code editing or a heavy app platform; use a website builder or Next.js instead.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~15 usable public sources. Many 'Astro' search results were unrelated products (headsets, tires, Astro Malaysia TV, Astro by Astronomer) and were excluded.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Open source

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Content-heavy marketing sites
  • Blogs and docs sites
  • Dev teams leaving WordPress or Gatsby
  • Mixed static + dynamic pages

Not for

  • Non-technical teams wanting a website builder
  • No-code founders — use Squarespace or Framer instead
  • App-heavy products where fits better
  • Teams needing vendor SLAs and support contracts

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Free software, but the real cost is developer time — agencies charge real money for builds

medium

Open source means no vendor SLA; support is community-based

medium

SSRF CVEs target host-header and server-rendered handling; keep versions current

low

Guess: mostly static sites avoid the server-side CVEs above

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free and open source — a faster, leaner switch from WordPress
  • Covers content sites, web apps, and server APIs in one tool
  • Microsoft chose it for its Fluent 2 design system site
  • Reddit users call it fantastic
  • Community says it can now do nearly everything

Cons

  • Recent SSRF and XSS CVEs need prompt patching
  • No dedicated security page found on
  • Developer framework — no code-free editing for marketers
  • Teams still weigh it against for app-heavy builds

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 15 sources - Active CVE stream in 2025–2026 — SSRF via host-header handling and XSS in image endpoints; patches shipped via GitHub advisories.

official x2review x8security x5
  • CVE-2025-64745, Vulnerability in the Astro web framework tracked on NIST NVD.
  • CVE-2026-27829 — SSRF, Server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Astro framework.
  • CVE-2026-25545 — SSRF via Host header, SSRF through host-header injection in error pages.
  • CVE-2026-41067 — XSS, Cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Astro web framework.
  • GHSA-fvmw-cj7j-j39q — XSS in /_image endpoint, Cross-site scripting in Astro's /_image endpoint, per official GitHub advisory.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 15

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Free and open source, zero license cost
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Users call it fantastic; developer-first workflow
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Content sites to apps and server APIs
  • Support quality. No support evidence found
  • Security posture: 3/5. Multiple SSRF/XSS CVEs, actively patched
  • $0 Price Open-source framework, no license fees
  • Yes Free tier The entire framework is free
  • 2022 Company founded Astro Technology Company announced

Pricing

Open source

$0

  • Full framework and integrations
  • Community support, no SLA

Security

Active CVE stream in 2025–2026 — SSRF via host-header handling and XSS in image endpoints; patches shipped via GitHub advisories.

  • CVE-2025-64745Vulnerability in the Astro web framework tracked on NIST NVD.11
  • CVE-2026-27829 — SSRFServer-side request forgery vulnerability in the Astro framework.12
  • CVE-2026-25545 — SSRF via Host headerSSRF through host-header injection in error pages.13
  • CVE-2026-41067 — XSSCross-site scripting vulnerability in the Astro web framework.
  • GHSA-fvmw-cj7j-j39q — XSS in /_image endpointCross-site scripting in Astro's /_image endpoint, per official GitHub advisory.14

What users say

Developer sentiment is strongly positive — called fantastic and able to do it all — with ongoing debate about when it's the wrong fit.

“Astro is fantastic”
Reddit, r/webdev
“Astro can do it all”
Reddit, r/astrojs
“Goodbye WordPress. Hello Astro. Faster, leaner, and free.”
Reddit, r/astrojs

Alternatives

Compare Astro with each alternative.

  • Squarespace or Framer

    No-code website builders for non-technical owners

Companies that use it

  • Microsoft²

Companies that could

  • WordPress⁶ Uses WordPress instead
  • Gatsby⁹ Uses Gatsby instead
  • Hugo10 Uses Hugo instead
Full analysis

Based on ~15 usable public sources. Many 'Astro' search results were unrelated products (headsets, tires, Astro Malaysia TV, Astro by Astronomer) and were excluded.

Free open-source framework devs love for content sites; no-code teams and app-heavy products should look elsewhere.

Methodology

Based on ~15 usable public sources. Many 'Astro' search results were unrelated products (headsets, tires, Astro Malaysia TV, Astro by Astronomer) and were excluded.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. Jekyll vs Astrokooslooijesteijn.net
    review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. security
  12. security
  13. security
  14. security
  15. security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.