shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

BioRender: Scientific Figure and Illustration Software Review

Worth it

Should I use BioRender: Scientific Figure and Illustration Software?

Create publication-ready scientific figures in minutes. Trusted by 4M+ researchers, 500K+ journal citations. Start free. - biorender.com

· 3 weeks ago

Buy if you regularly make biology or medical figures — it is the de facto standard with a usable free tier. Skip it for general design or offline work; a vector editor fits better.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 30+ public sources; most review snippets were truncated and no independent ratings were found, so confidence is medium.

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence in sources
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes

Best for

  • Life-science researchers publishing papers
  • Grant and thesis figures
  • Pharma and biotech science teams
  • Biology educators and students

Not for

  • Non-biology fields — the icon library is life-science specific
  • Offline or air-gapped environments — it is web-only
  • Designers needing full vector control (use Illustrator/Inkscape)
  • One-off figure makers unwilling to pay past the free tier

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Online-only: figure work stalls without internet access

medium

A cottage industry of free-alternative guides exists, largely driven by cost

low

'Up to 3x grant funding' is a vendor marketing claim, not a guarantee

low

Vendor user counts shifted from '1M+ scientists' to '4M+ researchers' — verify claims

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Thousands of field-specific icons and templates across science disciplines
  • Free tier to start creating figures
  • 500K+ journal citations; output widely accepted in publications
  • Adopted by pharma scientists, including teams at Novartis
  • Cited in methods sections of numerous 2026 peer-reviewed papers

Cons

  • Web-only tool; no offline desktop app
  • Some users warn of 'hidden dangers' in its convenient workflow
  • Cost pushes budget users to publish free-alternative guides

Sources & method

- 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x3security x1news x2

Key stats

  • Ease of use: 4/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence in sources
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Marketed as figures 'in minutes'; Reddit treats it as default
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Thousands of icons and templates across science fields
  • Support quality. No support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. Publishes security page; no public incidents found
  • 4M+ Researchers using it vendor claim
  • 500K+ Journal citations vendor claim
  • Yes Free tier 'Start free' on site
  • Up to 3x grant funding Claimed funding impact vendor marketing claim

Pricing

Free

Free

  • Start free to create scientific figures

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Reddit and blog chatter treats BioRender as the default for science graphics, while critics flag hidden downsides and cost-driven hunts for free alternatives.

“For graphics and icons, biorender…”
Reddit, r/labrats

Alternatives

Compare BioRender: Scientific Figure and Illustration Software with each alternative.

  • Adobe Illustrator

    Professional vector standard if you don't need bio-specific icons

Companies that use it

  • Novartis⁹
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP)⁷
Full analysis

Based on 30+ public sources; most review snippets were truncated and no independent ratings were found, so confidence is medium.

Life-science figure standard with a real free tier. Web-only, and pricing pushes budget users toward free alternatives.

Methodology

Based on 30+ public sources; most review snippets were truncated and no independent ratings were found, so confidence is medium.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. BioRender homepagebiorender.com
    official
  2. BioRender illustration product pagebiorender.com
    official
  3. BioRender security pagebiorender.com
    security
  4. Scientific figure software sucks — r/labratsreddit.com
    review
  5. Nick Desnoyer on the hidden danger of BioRenderx.com
    review
  6. Best Free BioRender Alternatives — PaperBananapaperbanana.me
    review
  7. CHOP announces BioRender availabilityresearch.chop.edu
    news
  8. MDPI paper using BioRender for figuresmdpi.com
    news
  9. BioRender LinkedIn post on Novartis scientistslinkedin.com
    official

Add this review to your site

BioRender: Scientific Figure and Illustration Software earned a Worth it check.

Put the badge on your site, pricing page, or docs.

Visitors see an independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Worth it BioRender: Scientific Figure and Illustration Software Independent review on Should I Use It

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.