shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Buffer Review

Depends

Should I use Buffer?

Social media management for everyone - buffer.com

· 1 month ago

Buy if you schedule to a handful of channels and want the simplest tool available. Skip if you manage many accounts or need deep analytics — per-channel fees stack up and features stay light.

Confidence

High. Based on ~18 public sources. Security search results were noisy (buffer-overflow CVEs unrelated to Buffer); only a resolved 2013 breach page was relevant.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo direct support evidence found
  • Security postureOnly a resolved 2013 breach disclosed; nothing recent

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Essentials$6/channel/month ($60/yr)

Best for

  • Creators on 1–8 channels
  • Small businesses wanting simple scheduling
  • Solo marketers ditching Hootsuite
  • Anyone testing a free scheduler

Not for

  • Agencies with many client accounts — fees balloon
  • Analytics-heavy teams needing deep reporting
  • Enterprises needing approval workflows
  • Budget buyers managing 10+ channels

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Per-channel fees stack: 12 accounts ≈ $60/month; unlimited-channel rivals undercut this

medium

Essentials bills per channel ($6/mo each); multi-channel setups multiply the bill quickly

medium

Free plan is limited; real cost emerges at 5–25 channels

low

Trustpilot reviewers complain about forced app download and onboarding friction

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Reviewers call it the easiest social scheduler to pick up
  • 4.3/5 on G2 across 1,088 reviews; praised for intuitive scheduling
  • Cheaper entry point than Hootsuite's cheapest plan
  • Best suited to one to eight channels
  • Clean, intuitive design

Cons

  • Pricing scales poorly: 12 accounts cost about $60/month
  • Shallower analytics than rivals like Metricool
  • Described as lightweight compared with alternatives
  • Some users hit auto-posting roadblocks

Sources & method

- 12 sources - No current vulnerabilities found in sources; Buffer publicly disclosed and resolved a 2013 breach.

official x2review x8security x1news x1
  • 2013 security breach (resolved), Buffer published its own breach-resolution page with remediation steps; historical, not current.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Cheap per channel; stacks up across many accounts
  • Ease of use: 5/5. Reviewers consistently call it the easiest scheduler
  • Feature depth: 2/5. Lightweight; rivals like Metricool offer deeper analytics
  • Support quality. No direct support evidence found
  • Security posture. Only a resolved 2013 breach disclosed; nothing recent
  • 4.3/5 G2 rating 1,088 reviews
  • $6/mo Starting price per channel, Essentials plan
  • Yes Free tier $0 plan for testing
  • $22.3M ARR Revenue reported 2025

Pricing

Free

$0

  • For testing Buffer or very small setups
  • Limited channels and features

Essentials

$6/channel/month ($60/yr)

  • Per-channel billing
  • Cheapest paid tier
  • Scheduling for Instagram and other networks

Security

No current vulnerabilities found in sources; Buffer publicly disclosed and resolved a 2013 breach.

  • 2013 security breach (resolved)Buffer published its own breach-resolution page with remediation steps; historical, not current.12

What users say

Users consistently praise Buffer's simplicity but grumble that per-channel pricing scales badly.

“Buffer is Great, but Its Pricing Sucks”
Reddit, r/microsaas
“I've heard that metricool has a lot more analytics options, which I like.”
Reddit, r/SocialMediaManagers
“The epitome of what I was trying to avoid. Need to download an app”
Trustpilot reviewer

Alternatives

Compare Buffer with each alternative.

  • Zoho Social

    Positioned for businesses and agencies instead

  • Metricool

    Stronger analytics if reporting matters

  • Blotato

    Founder-tested pick for creators and small operators

    Buffer vs Blotato
Full analysis

Based on ~18 public sources. Security search results were noisy (buffer-overflow CVEs unrelated to Buffer); only a resolved 2013 breach page was relevant.

Loved for simplicity with a real free tier, but per-channel pricing stacks fast past ~8 channels and analytics stay shallow.

Methodology

Based on ~18 public sources. Security search results were noisy (buffer-overflow CVEs unrelated to Buffer); only a resolved 2013 breach page was relevant.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. official
  2. Buffer Pricingbuffer.com
    official
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. news
  12. security

Add this review to your site

This check for Buffer says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.