shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Check Point Software Review

Depends

Should I use Check Point Software?

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is a leading provider of cyber security solutions to corporate enterprises and governments globally. - checkpoint.com

· 1 month ago

Check Point fits large enterprises and governments with dedicated security staff and partner-led procurement budgets. Small teams without security admins should not buy — pricing is quote-only and operations are heavy.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 40+ public sources: G2/Gartner reviews, Reddit threads, vendor advisories, case studies, and news coverage. No verbatim user quotes were extractable from truncated snippets.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo direct support-quality evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Enterprises and governments
  • Orgs with dedicated security teams
  • Multi-site perimeter defense
  • Regulated industries needing deep audit trails

Not for

  • Small businesses with no IT/security staff
  • Startups wanting transparent self-serve pricing
  • Home offices or single-site networks
  • Teams without budget for partner implementation

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Company confirmed its own security incident; demand details during due diligence

medium

Hidden costs likely — Vendr tracks Check Point fee negotiation; audit total contract cost

medium

Licenses and hardware sold via resellers like CDW; renewal pricing can jump

medium

Guess: migrating firewall policies off Check Point is painful; plan exit costs

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Full stack: NGFW, SASE, email security, exposure management
  • Recognized as G2 Grid Leader for comprehensive security vision
  • Long track record serving enterprises and governments since 1993
  • Active in-house threat research team (Check Point Research)
  • Publishes security advisories with patch guidance

Cons

  • No public pricing; sales go through partners only
  • Vendor confirmed its own 2025 security incident
  • Issued response to BreachForum post about company data (March 2025)
  • Built for corporate scale; heavy for smaller orgs

Sources & method

- 10 sources - Vendor with active advisory program and strong research arm; Check Point itself confirmed a 2025 security incident and responded to a BreachForum post about its data.

official x2review x5security x2news x1
  • Confirmed company security incident, Check Point confirmed a security incident and published sk183307 responding to a March 2025 BreachForum post about company data.
  • Ongoing CVE advisories, Regular advisories with CVEs requiring customer patching, e.g. the July 2026 action-required advisory.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Quote-only pricing; hidden costs flagged by Vendr
  • Ease of use: 3/5. Guess: powerful but complex enterprise management
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Full stack: firewall, SASE, email, endpoint, exposure
  • Support quality. No direct support-quality evidence found
  • Security posture: 3/5. Strong research arm, but confirmed own 2025 incident
  • 1993 Founded Israeli security vendor; NASDAQ: CHKP
  • Quote-only Pricing No public list prices; partner-led sales
  • 4+ Product lines NGFW, SASE, email, exposure management
  • 1 confirmed Incidents 2025 company security incident

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Vendor with active advisory program and strong research arm; Check Point itself confirmed a 2025 security incident and responded to a BreachForum post about its data.

  • Confirmed company security incidentCheck Point confirmed a security incident and published sk183307 responding to a March 2025 BreachForum post about company data.⁶
  • Ongoing CVE advisoriesRegular advisories with CVEs requiring customer patching, e.g. the July 2026 action-required advisory.

What users say

Reviews span Gartner, G2, and active Reddit debates where sysadmins compare Check Point against Fortinet and Palo Alto.

Companies that use it

  • Clarks⁹
  • Santillana
  • Connexus Energy
  • SEP2
  • Swiss Re
Full analysis

Based on 40+ public sources: G2/Gartner reviews, Reddit threads, vendor advisories, case studies, and news coverage. No verbatim user quotes were extractable from truncated snippets.

Enterprise-grade security for orgs with security staff and partner budgets. Small teams: quote-only pricing, heavy ops — skip.

Methodology

Based on 40+ public sources: G2/Gartner reviews, Reddit threads, vendor advisories, case studies, and news coverage. No verbatim user quotes were extractable from truncated snippets.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. security
  7. security
  8. official
  9. Clarks case studycheckpoint.com
    official
  10. news

Add this review to your site

This check for Check Point Software says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.