shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use Cheek Media Co. | Hannah Ferguson | Substack?

cheekmedia.substack.com·Analyzed 1 week ago··Based on 12 sources

Independent, progressive news commentary on topics that sit at the intersection of political, social and feminist issues. Click to read "Cheek Media Co.", a Substack publication with tens of thousands of subscribers.

Verdict

Depends

Subscribe if you want personality-led progressive Australian commentary on politics, gender and social issues, with strong video and podcast output.

Confidence: Medium

Skip it if you want neutral straight news or deep policy analysis — critics call the analysis surface-level, and the founder is now running against the Prime Minister.

Progressive Aussie commentary with big reach — good for opinion, skip for neutral news or deep policy.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 12

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. Founder admitted paid extras were 'inconsistent', not 'genuinely good'.
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Guess: standard Substack email, easy subscribe.
  • Feature depth: 3/5. Broad commentary, but critics say analysis surface-level.
  • Support quality. No evidence in sources.
  • Security posture. No security page found in crawl.
  • Tens of thousands Subscribers Per Substack page
  • Substack Platform Email newsletter format
  • 250+ Instagram reels Plus TikTok and podcast presence
  • Grayndler Next political run Against the PM, next federal election

Pricing

Not disclosed

Best for and not for

Best for

  • Progressive Australian politics followers
  • Gen Z, social-first news consumers
  • Feminist and social-issue commentary readers

Not for

  • Readers wanting neutral, straight reporting
  • Deep policy analysis seekers
  • Conservative or centrist readers
  • Anyone allergic to election-campaign self-promotion

Biggest gotcha

  • mediumFounder admitted Patreon extras were 'inconsistent' and not 'genuinely good' — paid value has underdelivered before³
  • mediumElection campaign period may tilt commentary toward self-promotion²
  • lowNo published pricing visible on the page reviewed — check paid tier before committing¹

Pros

  • Independent commentary spanning politics, social and feminist issues¹
  • Tens of thousands of subscribers¹
  • Heavy cross-platform reach: Instagram, TikTok, podcasts⁹
  • Founder booked for National Press Club and mainstream media spots⁸

Cons

  • Opinion commentary, not neutral news reporting⁵
  • Critics call the analysis 'surface level'⁴
  • Founder running against the PM — potential campaign bias²
  • Past paid content admitted 'inconsistent' by founder herself³

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

The audience is large and engaged, but critics call the analysis surface-level and the founder admits past paid content underdelivered.

“Unfortunately, her analysis of issues is surface level, a reflection of limited life experience and relative privilege.”
Missing Perspectives, reader comment
“Paid Patreon subscriptions offered behind-the-scenes content, but Ferguson admits the offerings were "inconsistent" and not "genuinely good".”
Piji News, founder interview

Methodology

Based on ~20 public sources; mostly news coverage of the founder, little independent review data on the newsletter itself.

Sources

  1. official
  2. news
  3. review
  4. review
  5. news
  6. news
  7. news
  8. official
  9. news
  10. review
  11. news
  12. security

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.