shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Chrome-Stats?

Chrome Extension & Mobile App Analytics - chrome-stats.com

Depends. Buy if you build, market, or vet browser extensions and need download, permission, and risk data in one place. Skip it if you just occasionally check one extension — the free public listing pages already cover that.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~30 public sources; pricing specifics, support quality, and named customers are thinly documented.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo usable evidence
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

$0

Free

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Pro subscriptionNot disclosed in reviewed sources

Best for

  • Extension developers tracking competitors
  • Security teams vetting browser extensions
  • Market researchers sizing extension niches

Not for

  • Casual users checking one extension — free pages suffice
  • Anyone needing guaranteed archival-grade data accuracy
  • Enterprises wanting SLAs and dedicated account support
  • Price-sensitive buyers — cheaper rivals exist

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Exact Pro price absent from reviewed sources; check before subscribing

medium

Solo-founder product; support depth and long-term bus factor unclear

medium

ArchiveTeam users question its reliability as a long-term data archive

low

Some recipients flag support@ emails as possible scam; verify senders

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Tracks Chrome extensions plus 1M iOS apps in one place
  • Permission-change history helps spot extensions that turned malicious
  • Risk Impact/Likelihood scoring flags suspicious extensions
  • ScamAdviser independently rates the site legit and safe
  • Slack bot delivers lookups inside team workspaces

Cons

  • Only one Capterra review; feedback base is tiny
  • Users question reliability of permission lists and archival data
  • Recipients sometimes mistake its support emails for scams
  • Rivals claim better insights at lower prices
  • Company details undisclosed; small founder-run operation

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 10 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

official x3review x6security x1

Key stats

  • Value for money: 3/5

    Rating

  • $0

    Starting price

  • 10

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 3/5. Rivals claim lower price for similar insights
  • Ease of use. No usable evidence
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Chrome + 1M iOS apps, permission history, risk scores, Slack bot
  • Support quality: 2/5. Users unsure its support emails are legitimate
  • Security posture: 3/5. ScamAdviser says legit; publishes security page
  • 5.0/5 Capterra rating 1 review
  • 2020 Founded Solo founder, launched via Reddit
  • ~$672.8K Revenue Crunchbase estimate
  • 1M+ iOS apps tracked Company claim

Pricing

Free

$0

  • Public listing pages
  • Basic stats and rankings

Pro subscription

Not disclosed

  • Advanced search
  • Alerts and deeper risk data

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Feedback is sparse: developers praise its data depth, while some users question email legitimacy and data reliability.

“Not sure if it's a scam or not”
Reddit, r/chrome_extensions
Full analysis

Based on ~30 public sources; pricing specifics, support quality, and named customers are thinly documented.

Solid data tool for extension devs and security teams; casual users can stick to free listing pages.

Methodology

Based on ~30 public sources; pricing specifics, support quality, and named customers are thinly documented.

Sources

  1. review
  2. official
  3. security
  4. official
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.