shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Cisco?

Not disclosed - cisco.com

Depends. Buy if you're a large organization with dedicated network engineers and a multi-year infrastructure budget — it remains the default for enterprise networking. Skip it for small offices, startups, or simple needs; you'll pay enterprise prices and complexity for capacity you won't use.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 35+ public sources across reviews, security trackers, pricing pages, and company data

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support quality
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • Enterprises with dedicated network teams
  • Large campuses and data centers
  • Hybrid-work conference rooms (Webex devices)
  • Orgs with multi-year infra budgets

Not for

  • Small businesses needing a few switches or Wi-Fi
  • Startups without network engineers on staff
  • Home offices
  • Buyers wanting transparent, self-serve pricing

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Deep ecosystem lock-in; switching later to Arista or Juniper is a known pain

medium

Quote-only pricing; global price lists exist but real costs come via partners

medium

Cisco confirmed upcoming list price increases — budget for renewals rising

medium

Smart Licensing activation is a recurring pain point per long-time partners

Pros and cons

Pros

  • 4.3/5 across 27,445 G2 product reviews
  • Practitioners still prefer Cisco for core networking
  • 97% of Cisco Duo customers would recommend it
  • Broad portfolio spanning networking, security, and collaboration
  • Free trials offered for Cisco Security products

Cons

  • Trustpilot customer service rating: 1.7/5
  • No public pricing; partner quotes required
  • List price increases confirmed
  • Smart Licensing widely criticized by partners
  • ISE zero-day auth bypass actively exploited

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/21/2026 - 14 sources - Active issues: an exploited ISE zero-day, a CISA KEV-listed email gateway CVE, and a claimed major breach — patch discipline is essential.

official x3review x5security x3news x3
  • Cisco ISE zero-day auth bypass actively exploited (CVE-2026-76460), Cisco warned of a zero-day authentication bypass in Identity Services Engine under active exploitation.
  • Cisco Secure Email Gateway flaw on CISA KEV (CVE-2026-76461), Listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog.
  • Massive breach claimed by ShinyHunters, A large-scale Cisco data breach was claimed by the ShinyHunters group; separate 2025 vishing attack hit a third-party CRM.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 2/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 14

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 2/5. Price hikes, opaque quotes, licensing complaints
  • Ease of use: 2/5. Steep learning curve; specialist skills required
  • Feature depth: 5/5. Largest networking vendor, huge portfolio
  • Support quality: 2/5. 1.7/5 Trustpilot; partner-dependent support
  • Security posture: 2/5. Exploited zero-day, KEV listing, breach claims
  • 4.3/5 G2 seller rating 27,445 reviews
  • 1.7/5 Trustpilot 61 reviews
  • 4.1/5 Glassdoor (employees) 33,904 reviews

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Active issues: an exploited ISE zero-day, a CISA KEV-listed email gateway CVE, and a claimed major breach — patch discipline is essential.

  • Cisco ISE zero-day auth bypass actively exploited (CVE-2026-76460)Cisco warned of a zero-day authentication bypass in Identity Services Engine under active exploitation.⁶
  • Cisco Secure Email Gateway flaw on CISA KEV (CVE-2026-76461)Listed in CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog.⁷
  • Massive breach claimed by ShinyHuntersA large-scale Cisco data breach was claimed by the ShinyHunters group; separate 2025 vishing attack hit a third-party CRM.⁸

What users say

Practitioners still rate Cisco's core networking as the preferred choice, but complain about licensing, pricing, and support.

“Networking wise, people still prefer Cisco, but Juniper”
Reddit, r/Cisco
“We like cisco compared to some worse companies”
Reddit, r/Cisco

Companies that use it

  • Riot Games14
Full analysis

Based on 35+ public sources across reviews, security trackers, pricing pages, and company data

Enterprise networking, security & collaboration. The default for big orgs — overkill and opaque for small teams.

Methodology

Based on 35+ public sources across reviews, security trackers, pricing pages, and company data

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. review
  4. review
  5. review
  6. security
  7. security
  8. security
  9. news
  10. news
  11. news
  12. official
  13. official
  14. official

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.