shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

ClearML Review

Depends

Should I use ClearML?

Open-source MLOps platform for experiment tracking, orchestration, and model deployment - clear.ml

· 1 week ago

ClearML fits teams actually training ML models that want open-source experiment tracking and orchestration; evidence reviewed was thin, so confidence is low. Skip it if you're not running ML workloads, and review its two 2024 CVEs before adopting.

Confidence

Low. Based on 3 usable public sources for ClearML; most 'Clear' evidence retrieved refers to unrelated companies (airport biometrics, HR software, insurance).

Ratings

  • Value for moneyNo pricing evidence found
  • Ease of useNo user review evidence found
  • Feature depthNo feature evidence found
  • Support qualityNo support evidence found
  • Security posture

Pricing

Not disclosed

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed

Best for

  • ML teams tracking experiments
  • GPU training orchestration
  • GenAI/LLM app developers
  • Teams comfortable self-hosting

Not for

  • Teams not training models — pure overkill
  • Solo devs needing simple metric logging
  • Orgs with no capacity to patch CVEs
  • Non-technical buyers wanting turnkey software

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

CVE-2024-24592 auth bypass: unpatched instances risk unauthorized access to experiments and data.

high

CVE-2024-24591 path traversal: self-hosted deployments could expose server files.

medium

Guess: self-hosted open-source deployments leave patching and hardening entirely on your team.

low

'Clear' name collides with airport biometrics and HR software, making vendor research error-prone.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Publishes a dedicated product security page

Cons

  • 2024 auth bypass vulnerability disclosed
  • 2024 path traversal vulnerability disclosed

Sources & method

- 3 sources - Two 2024 CVEs disclosed for ClearML (auth bypass and path traversal); a product security page exists.

official x1security x2
  • CVE-2024-24592: ClearML Auth Bypass Vulnerability, Authentication bypass vulnerability in ClearML disclosed via SentinelOne's vulnerability database.
  • CVE-2024-24591: ClearML Path Traversal Vulnerability, Path traversal vulnerability in ClearML disclosed via SentinelOne's vulnerability database.

Key stats

  • Security posture: 3/5

    Rating

  • Not disclosed

    Starting price

  • 3

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money. No pricing evidence found
  • Ease of use. No user review evidence found
  • Feature depth. No feature evidence found
  • Support quality. No support evidence found
  • Security posture: 3/5. Two 2024 CVEs disclosed: auth bypass, path traversal
  • 2 Known CVEs (2024) Auth bypass and path traversal

Pricing

Not disclosed

Security

Two 2024 CVEs disclosed for ClearML (auth bypass and path traversal); a product security page exists.

  • CVE-2024-24592: ClearML Auth Bypass VulnerabilityAuthentication bypass vulnerability in ClearML disclosed via SentinelOne's vulnerability database.¹
  • CVE-2024-24591: ClearML Path Traversal VulnerabilityPath traversal vulnerability in ClearML disclosed via SentinelOne's vulnerability database.²

What users say

No verifiable ClearML user reviews were found in the sources reviewed; nearly all 'Clear' results refer to unrelated companies.

Alternatives

Compare ClearML with each alternative.

  • MLflow

    Open-source experiment tracking; simplest free starting point.

  • Weights & Biases

    Polished hosted experiment tracking with strong collaboration features.

  • Neptune.ai

    Lightweight experiment tracking geared to smaller ML teams.

    ClearML vs Neptune.ai
Full analysis

Based on 3 usable public sources for ClearML; most 'Clear' evidence retrieved refers to unrelated companies (airport biometrics, HR software, insurance).

Serious MLOps for ML teams; overkill for everyone else. Thin public evidence, two 2024 CVEs — check security posture first.

Methodology

Based on 3 usable public sources for ClearML; most 'Clear' evidence retrieved refers to unrelated companies (airport biometrics, HR software, insurance).

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. security
  2. security
  3. official

Add this review to your site

This check for ClearML says Depends.

Put the badge on your site.

Visitors see the independent review.

The link points here, and search engines follow it.

This is the badge visitors see on your site.

Paste one snippet. Keep the link as it is. A nofollow tag stops search engines from following it.

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.