4.4/5
G2 rating
453 reviews
Report
Hire better devs with CoderPad's live coding interview & technical assessment platform. Filter candidates based on their coding skills, in 99+ languages.
Depends
DependsBuy if you hire developers every month and need standardized, proctored screens wired into an ATS.
Mature live-coding interview platform. Great for steady dev hiring; pricey overkill for occasional hires.
4.4/5
G2 rating
453 reviews
$120/mo
Starting price
Free tier: 2 interviews/month
3.3/5
Trustpilot
Candidate-side TrustScore
$17.8M ARR
Scale
2024 revenue; founded 2013
Pay-per-interview; fine at volume, costly occasionally
G2 reviewers praise user-friendly design
99+ languages, screening, anti-cheat, ATS integrations
Bug bounty, disclosure policy, continuous scans
$0
From $120/month
Not disclosed
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Buyers on G2 (4.4/5) praise the polish while candidates on Reddit and Trustpilot (3.3) often find the tests stressful and heavily surveilled.
“CoderPad test makes me feel like shit”
“If you're doing a coderpad tech screen, don't copy the code”
Compare CoderPad with each alternative.
Bigger enterprise assessment suite; the default at large companies.
Skill assessments with certified scores for standardization.
CoderPad vs CodeSignalRealistic take-home tasks instead of live interviews.
CoderPad vs CodeSubmitCost nothing for low-volume hiring with an engineer interviewing.
Based on 20+ public sources: G2, Trustpilot, Reddit, vendor docs, case studies, and third-party pricing reviews.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.
Comments
One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.
No comments yet.