shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use Confluent?

confluent.io·Analyzed 53 minutes ago·Based on 12 sources

Stream, connect, process, and govern your data with a unified Data Streaming Platform built on the heritage of Apache Kafka and Apache Flink.

Depends

Depends

Buy only if you run serious real-time data pipelines and have platform engineers to operate them.

Enterprise Kafka streaming: powerful at scale, pricey and complex — small teams should not touch it.

Confidence: Medium

5,720

Companies using it

tracked deployments worldwide

Yes

Free option

self-managed open-source core

$125M

Series D funding

announced round

113+

G2 reviews

product and seller reviews

Value for money2

Opaque pricing, hidden cloud costs cited widely

Ease of use2

Setup described as not straightforward

Feature depth5

Complete streaming stack: Kafka, Flink, connectors, governance

Security posture4

Active CVE advisories, trust center, compliance certifications

Pros

  • Named top event stream processing platform on G2
  • Full platform: Kafka, Flink, connectors, and governance in one product
  • Enterprise-grade security, compliance certifications, and a public trust center
  • Kafka used by thousands of companies — proven at scale
  • Well-funded, established vendor with deep Kafka expertise

Cons

  • Pricing widely called opaque, with hidden cloud costs³
  • No easy way to estimate total cost upfront
  • Setup not straightforward for newcomers¹
  • Hourly usage billing makes monthly spend unpredictable
  • Teams actively shop for alternatives over cost and complexity12

Gotchas

  • highCloud bills hide costs: egress, connectors, and cluster sizing inflate invoices fast.³
  • mediumSelf-managed Platform is 'technically free' but ops overhead and support contracts cost real money.
  • mediumUsage-based hourly billing; easy to overspend before you notice.
  • mediumDeep Kafka coupling creates migration pain if pricing outgrows your budget.12

Best for

  • Real-time data streaming at enterprise scale
  • Event-driven microservices architectures
  • Teams standardizing on Kafka and Flink
  • Organizations needing data stream governance

Not for

  • Small teams needing a simple message queue
  • Companies without dedicated data-platform engineers
  • Budget-sensitive startups fearing unpredictable usage bills
  • Simple batch ETL jobs — cheaper tools exist

Companies that use it

  • Audacy
  • Glean

Pricing

Confluent Platform

'Technically free' open-source components; paid enterprise licensing

  • Self-managed Kafka distribution
  • Enterprise security and support add-ons

Confluent Cloud

Usage-based, billed hourly

  • Fully managed Kafka and Flink
  • Pay-per-use, no upfront commitment

Security

Mature enterprise security program: publishes CVE advisories, maintains a trust center, holds compliance certifications.

  • CVE-2024-56128 — Kafka SCRAM authentication flawIncorrect authentication algorithm implementation in Kafka's SCRAM; remediated by upgrading Confluent Platform.
  • CVE-2021-38153 — Timing attacksKafka vulnerability enabling timing attacks, addressed via Confluent security bulletin.

What users say

Reviewers praise Confluent's streaming power and G2 standing but repeatedly flag opaque pricing, hidden costs, and non-trivial setup.

Is it a good value?
Reddit, r/apachekafka
I didn't build Kafka
Medium, Cloud With Azeem case study

Alternatives

Compare Confluent with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on 25+ public sources; several review snippets were truncated, so no extended user quotes were extracted.

Sources

  1. review
  2. review
  3. news
  4. official
  5. official
  6. security
  7. security
  8. official
  9. review
  10. news
  11. news
  12. news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.