shouldiuse.io

Report

Should I Use Connected Papers?

connectedpapers.com·Analyzed 2 hours ago··Based on 12 sources

Connected Papers is a visual tool to help researchers and applied scientists find academic papers relevant to their field of work.

Worth it

Worth it

Buy if you're a researcher, PhD student, or applied scientist mapping related work around a paper you already have.

Cheap, visual literature scout: paste a seed paper, get ~50 related works. Weak for systematic reviews and newest papers.

Confidence: High

9.41/10

G2 rating

309+ reviews per Tooliverse consensus

$6/mo

Starting price

Academic plan, billed $72 annually

5 graphs/mo

Free tier

All features included, no account required

~50 papers

Graph size

Per graph, arranged by similarity

Value for money5

Generous free tier; $6/mo academic is cheap

Ease of use5

Paste a paper, get an instant graph

Feature depth3

Similarity graphs only; thin for systematic work

Pros

  • Free tier includes every feature; no account needed to start
  • One seed paper yields an interactive graph of ~50 related works
  • Strong reviews: 9.4/10 consensus across 309+ users
  • Users report finding papers standard searches missed
  • arXiv partnership strengthens math, physics, and ML coverage

Cons

  • Weak coverage of the very latest publications
  • Maps similarity, not citation chains
  • Not sufficient alone for systematic reviews
  • Each graph covers only ~50 papers

Gotchas

  • mediumFree plan hard-caps at 5 graphs/month; heavy literature passes force the upgrade
  • mediumAcademic plan is $72 billed annually, not a true month-to-month $6
  • mediumOne-shot ~50-paper graphs; systematic-review-scale work needs other or paid tooling

Best for

  • PhD students and academics
  • Applied scientists entering a new field
  • Quick literature scans around a seed paper
  • arXiv-heavy fields: ML, physics, math

Not for

  • Systematic review teams needing exhaustive, reproducible coverage
  • Anyone chasing the newest publications — lag noted in reviews
  • Researchers needing citation-chain tracing; it maps similarity, not citations
  • Non-academic teams — this is strictly scholarly literature discovery

Companies that use it

  • ETH Zurich (library guide)
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Hong Kong Metropolitan University
  • EdTech Hub

Pricing

Free

$0

  • 5 graphs per month
  • All features included
  • No account required

Academic

$6/mo (billed $72 annually)

  • Unlimited graphs

Business

Not published in reviewed sources

  • Unlimited graphs
  • Commercial-use licensing

Security

No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.

What users say

Users love it for surfacing papers they'd otherwise miss; the recurring complaint is coverage of the newest publications.

I was able to find links to a paper I hadn’t been able to find and discovered relevant papers I hadn’t seen before. Definitely recommend!
Reddit, r/math
While the tool is excellent for finding related papers in your field, it might have some limitations when it comes to searching for the very latest publications
G2 review
When researching a paper I always try to find papers that cited or were cited by instead so this will be a real short-cut! It's like the research version of ancestry.com.
Reddit, r/InternetIsBeautiful

Alternatives

Compare Connected Papers with each alternative.

Full analysis

Based on 12+ public sources: aggregated reviews, Reddit threads, university library guides, and comparison sites.

Sources

  1. official
  2. Connected Papers pricingconnectedpapers.com
    official
  3. security
  4. review
  5. review
  6. review
  7. review
  8. review
  9. review
  10. review
  11. review
  12. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Ask a follow-up

Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.

    Comments

    One queue. No replies. Give a display name first. Limit: 7 comments per day.

    Save a name to write a comment.

    No comments yet.