4.3/5
G2 rating
30 verified reviews
Report
Professional live streaming and video hosting for organizations that broadcast on a schedule. From $39/mo.
Depends
DependsBuy if you broadcast on a schedule and can absorb prepaid bandwidth pricing; it's a legitimate pro platform with real security.
Pro streaming from $39/mo with real security, but bandwidth pricing and mixed reviews suit scheduled broadcasters, not casual streamers.
4.3/5
G2 rating
30 verified reviews
$39/mo
Starting price
Prepaid bandwidth bundles
No
Free tier
7-day trial, no credit card
400,000+
Scale
Video producers as of early 2025
Cheap entry; bandwidth costs climb unpredictably
Easy onboarding, but reviewers say polish lags
Live, VOD, OTT, API, security all covered
24/7 promised; Reddit reports unresolved issues
AES-128, HLS encryption, passwords well documented
From $39/mo
Negotiated
No known public vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed.
Reviews split sharply: many praise reliability, easy onboarding, and value, while pro video engineers and some billers report serious frustrations.
“Dacast sucks.”
“Dacast & Vimeo Live are worthy options.”
“Good service overall, reliable video hosting to affo”
Compare Dacast with each alternative.
First-named G2 alternative; stronger polish and brand trust
Dacast vs VimeoCheaper multistreaming rival with a no-card trial
Dacast vs CastrDeveloper-first video infrastructure favored in pro Reddit threads
Dacast vs MuxTurnkey OTT monetization without bandwidth math
Dacast vs UscreenBased on ~20 public sources: G2, Capterra, Trustpilot, Reddit, Wikipedia, and Dacast's own docs.
Anonymous. You can change your vote.
Loading votes…
Ask if a use case fits. Answers stay inside this report and its sources.