shouldiuse.io

VERDICT

Should I use Doaj?

(none) - doaj.org

Worth it. Free, community-funded index that is the de facto whitelist for legitimate open-access journals — researchers, librarians and funders should use it. Journal publishers face strict, slow application criteria, and it does not replace Scopus where metrics or prestige are required.

Confidence

Medium. Based on ~30 public sources. DOAJ is nonprofit open-access infrastructure, not commercial software, so ratings, SLAs, and competitor pricing do not apply.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of use
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo support quality evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free

Free use

Model3
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Supporter (voluntary)Voluntary contribution

Best for

  • Researchers vetting open-access journals
  • Librarians curating trusted OA collections
  • Funders checking OA compliance
  • OA publishers building credibility

Not for

  • Buyers wanting a purchasable SaaS tool with support SLAs
  • Authors needing impact factors or citation metrics
  • Committees requiring Scopus/Web of Science prestige
  • Journals wanting quick, guaranteed indexing

Gotchas - check before you buy

high

Fake journals claim DOAJ indexing; always verify on itself, not the journal's site

medium

Journal applications are strict and rejection is possible; expect a slow, documentation-heavy process

medium

DOAJ listing alone will not satisfy committees or funders demanding Scopus/Web of Science indexing

low

Sustainability depends on voluntary publisher, library, and funder donations; expect ongoing funding appeals

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Free to search; free for journals to apply and be listed
  • Treated as the de facto whitelist for legitimate open-access journals
  • Used by funders and institutions for open-access compliance checks
  • Reviewer praised its easy-to-use, transparent interface
  • Public API available for metadata reuse

Cons

  • Strict criteria; journal applications can be rejected
  • Some journals falsely claim DOAJ indexing — verify directly
  • No formal security policy published on its GitHub repo
  • Some academics see DOAJ indexing as less prestigious than Scopus

Sources & method

Analyzed 9/20/2026 - 13 sources - No vulnerabilities found for DOAJ itself; a 2025 XSS CVE affects a third-party WordPress export plugin, not doaj.org. The site survived a 2018 attack.

official x4review x4security x3news x2
  • XSS in third-party WordPress 'DOAJ Export' plugin (CVE-2025-58256), Affects a WordPress plugin that exports DOAJ data, not itself.
  • 2018 site attack, DOAJ's website came under attack in 2018 and highlighted infrastructure funding needs.
  • No published security policy, GitHub shows no security policy for the DOAJ/doaj repository.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 5/5

    Rating

  • Free

    Starting price

  • 13

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 5/5. Entirely free; nonprofit-funded infrastructure
  • Ease of use: 4/5. Reviewers call the site easy to use
  • Feature depth: 3/5. Directory plus API; no metrics or workflow tools
  • Support quality. No support quality evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 3/5. No known CVEs; no public security policy
  • Free Price Searching and journal listing cost nothing
  • Yes Free tier Whole service runs on voluntary supporter funding
  • 3 Supporter models Publisher, library, and funder support options
  • Target met in 18 months Funding SPARC Europe campaign, 2019

Pricing

Free use

Free

  • Full search of all indexed OA journals
  • No cost for journals to apply or be listed

Supporter (voluntary)

Voluntary contribution

  • Publisher, library/institutional, and funder tiers
  • Keeps the nonprofit service sustainable

Security

No vulnerabilities found for DOAJ itself; a 2025 XSS CVE affects a third-party WordPress export plugin, not doaj.org.

  • XSS in third-party WordPress 'DOAJ Export' plugin (CVE-2025-58256)Affects a WordPress plugin that exports DOAJ data, not itself.⁸
  • 2018 site attackDOAJ's website came under attack in 2018 and highlighted infrastructure funding needs.10

The site survived a 2018 attack.

  • No published security policyGitHub shows no security policy for the DOAJ/doaj repository.⁹

What users say

Researchers and librarians treat DOAJ as the free go-to whitelist for legitimate open-access journals, while some debate whether it carries the same weight as Scopus.

“DOAJ's easy-to-use site provides a window of tran…”
Doody's Collection Development Review, 2022
“I advise you to ALWAYS check at https://doaj.org…”
DOAJ Blog
“Are Scopus and DOAJ indexed journals credible even if…”
Reddit, r/academia

Alternatives

Compare Doaj with each alternative.

  • OpenDOAR

    Free directory of open-access repositories, complements DOAJ

Companies that use it

  • SPARC Europe11
  • French National Research Agency (ANR)12
  • SETU Library
Full analysis

Based on ~30 public sources. DOAJ is nonprofit open-access infrastructure, not commercial software, so ratings, SLAs, and competitor pricing do not apply.

Free, authoritative whitelist of legit open-access journals. Use it to vet journals; not software you buy.

Methodology

Based on ~30 public sources. DOAJ is nonprofit open-access infrastructure, not commercial software, so ratings, SLAs, and competitor pricing do not apply.

Sources

  1. official
  2. official
  3. official
  4. official
  5. review
  6. review
  7. DOAJ, a real whitelist?researchgate.net
    review
  8. security
  9. security
  10. security
  11. news
  12. news
  13. review

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.