shouldiuse.io

Categories

VERDICT

Fluid Attacks Review

Depends

Should I use Fluid Attacks?

Home | Fluid Attacks Docs - docs.fluidattacks.com

· 4 hours ago

Buy if you run a dev-heavy org that wants continuous security testing with real pentesters and CI/CD integration. Skip it if you want a cheap one-off scan with published pricing you can self-serve.

Confidence

Medium. Based on 25+ public sources; many 'compare' pages are Fluid Attacks' own marketing, not independent reviews.

Ratings

  • Value for money
  • Ease of useNo usability evidence in sources
  • Feature depth
  • Support qualityNo direct support evidence in sources
  • Security posture

Pricing

Free trial

Essential

ModelNot disclosed
Monthly feesNot disclosed
HardwareNot disclosed
Free tierYes
Paid planContact sales

Best for

  • Dev teams wanting continuous pentesting in CI/CD
  • Orgs needing SCA and SBOMs
  • Compliance-driven AppSec programs
  • Buyers who value published security research

Not for

  • Small teams wanting one simple pentest report
  • Buyers needing public pricing and self-serve checkout
  • Non-technical orgs wanting checkbox compliance scanning
  • Guess: cloud-posture (CSPM) buyers — Wiz-style rivals fit better

Gotchas - check before you buy

medium

Pricing is opaque; expect a sales call before any real quote.

medium

Comparison tables across 30+ competitors are vendor-written; verify claims independently.

medium

FAQ references an 'Essential' scanning tier; paid-tier feature split is unclear — expect gating.

low

Feb 2026 docs outage hit authenticated users; public status page does exist.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • 9.44/10 from 228 Gartner reviews over 8 years
  • 289 CVEs reported to MITRE shows genuine research depth
  • Free trial scans your apps at no cost
  • GraphQL API plus IDE extensions for CI/CD integration
  • SCA builds SBOMs and flags supply-chain vulnerabilities

Cons

  • No public pricing — everything routes through sales
  • Docs site had a Feb 2026 access outage for authenticated users
  • Compare pages against 30+ rivals are self-published marketing
  • No security page published for the docs site

Sources & method

- 9 sources - No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; one Feb 2026 docs availability incident for authenticated users.

official x8news x1
  • Docs access unavailable for authenticated users (Feb 2026), Service incident affecting docs access for authenticated users; tracked publicly.

Key stats

  • Value for money: 4/5

    Rating

  • Free trial

    Starting price

  • 9

    Sources

  • Analyzed

  • Value for money: 4/5. Free trial scanning; paid tier requires sales quote
  • Ease of use. No usability evidence in sources
  • Feature depth: 4/5. Scanners, SCA/SBOMs, GraphQL API, IDE extensions
  • Support quality. No direct support evidence in sources
  • Security posture: 4/5. 289 MITRE CVEs, public status page, one docs outage
  • 9.44/10 Gartner reputation 228 reviews over 8 years
  • 9.27/10 Clutch/G2 reputation 388 reviews over 7 years
  • 289 CVEs discovered reported to MITRE
  • Bootstrapped Funding no external rounds listed

Pricing

Essential

Free trial

  • Vulnerability scanning platform
  • Search vulnerabilities in your apps for free

Paid plan

Not disclosed

  • Single paid tier per comparison tables
  • No public prices in sources

Security

No known vulnerabilities found in the sources reviewed; one Feb 2026 docs availability incident for authenticated users.

  • Docs access unavailable for authenticated users (Feb 2026)Service incident affecting docs access for authenticated users; tracked publicly.⁹

What users say

Independent user quotes are absent from the sources; reputation aggregates (9.44 Gartner, 9.27 Clutch/G2) stand in for reviews.

Full analysis

Based on 25+ public sources; many 'compare' pages are Fluid Attacks' own marketing, not independent reviews.

Serious continuous AppSec platform: free trial, deep research (289 CVEs), but pricing is sales-only — overkill for simple scan needs.

Methodology

Based on 25+ public sources; many 'compare' pages are Fluid Attacks' own marketing, not independent reviews.

Read how a report is made.

Sources

  1. Fluid Attacks Docs: Homedocs.fluidattacks.com
    official
  2. Platform FAQdocs.fluidattacks.com
    official
  3. Compare: Legit Securitydocs.fluidattacks.com
    official
  4. Compare: PentestGPTdocs.fluidattacks.com
    official
  5. Compare: Wizdocs.fluidattacks.com
    official
  6. Compare: Menddocs.fluidattacks.com
    official
  7. Platform APIdocs.fluidattacks.com
    official
  8. SCA product pagefluidattacks.com
    official
  9. Fluid Attacks docs outage incidentisdown.app
    news

Rate this review

Anonymous. You can change your vote.

Loading votes…

Comments

One queue. No nested comments. Give a display name first. Limit: 200 words per comment and 7 comments per day. You can edit or delete yours.

Save a name to write a comment.

0 / 200 words

No comments yet.